Ship Manuvering Analysis Using Virtual Captive Model Test On Trim And Sinkage Variations

Authors

  • Audi Razif Santoso UPN Veteran Jakarta
  • Fakhri Akbar Ayub UPN Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54378/astne.v4i2v2.05

Keywords:

Virtual Captive Model Test, Computational Fluid Dynamic, Trim, Sinkage, Sway Force

Abstract

This study evaluates the effect of trim and sinkage variations on ship hydrodynamic characteristics using the Virtual Captive Model Test (VCMT) based on Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) for the KRISO Container Ship (KCS) model. Simulations were conducted for sinkage variations of −0.00090, −0.00275, and −0.00599 and trim variations of 0.017°, 0.053°, and 0.097°, over drift angles ranging from 2° to 10° under two speed conditions represented by Froude numbers 0.152 and 0.163. The objective is to investigate the influence of trim and sinkage on lateral force (sway) and yaw moment and to determine hydrodynamic coefficients using the Least Squares regression method. The results show that trim and sinkage influence sway force and yaw moment, although their effects are smaller than those of speed and drift angle. Increased sinkage generally produces higher sway force and yaw moment due to increased wetted surface area and changes in hull pressure distribution, while trim mainly alters the longitudinal pressure distribution with relatively limited influence within the investigated range. The maximum nondimensional values of Y′ and N′ were obtained at Fr = 0.163 and a drift angle of 10° (Y′H = 0.206543 and N′H = 0.079192 for sinkage variation; Y′H = 0.202338 and N′H = 0.073965 for trim variation). The hydrodynamic forces and moments were nondimensionalized using the Yoshimura–Masumoto formulation and analyzed through Least Squares regression, yielding coefficients that agree well with the simulation results. The VCMT-based CFD approach combined with Least Squares regression provides an effective alternative for determining ship maneuvering hydrodynamic coefficients.

References

Ayub, F. A., & Furukawa, Y. (2024). Comparison Between Cubic and Quadratic Models of Hydrodynamic Derivatives to the Ship Course Stability Index. International Journal of Technology, 15(5), 1502–1523. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v15i5.7036

Barr, R. A. (2016). Ship Maneuvering and Control. Springer.

Carrica, P. M., Wilson, R. V., Sadat-Hosseini, H., & Stern, F. (2016). CFD simulations of ship maneuvering: Past, present, and future. Ocean Engineering, 116, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.02.007

Chapra, S. C., & Canale, R. P. (2010). Numerical Methods for Engineers (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Du, P., Liu, Z., & Yasukawa, H. (2022). Virtual captive model tests for ship maneuvering based on CFD and MMG model. Journal of Marine Science and Application, 21(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-022-00241-9

Fossen, T. I. (2011). Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control. John Wiley & Sons.

Hino, T. (2015). CFD-based captive model tests for ship maneuvering prediction. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(4), 685–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-015-0331-7

International Maritime Organization. (2020). Reports on Marine Casualties and Incidents. IMO.

ITTC. (2017). Recommended Procedures and Guidelines: CFD in Marine Hydrodynamics. International Towing Tank Conference.

Liu, Y., Yasukawa, H., & Yoshimura, Y. (2018). Evaluation of hydrodynamic derivatives of ships using CFD. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 23(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0496-3

Sutulo, S., & Soares, C. G. (2020). An overview of mathematical models for ship maneuvering. Ocean Engineering, 198, 106980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106980

Wang, Y. (2017). Development of computerized planar motion carriage system for ship maneuvering tests. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 29(4), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(16)60765-1

Wilson, R. V., & Haffenden, R. (2020). Advances in planar motion mechanism testing for ship maneuvering. Ocean Engineering, 195, 106690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106690

Yasukawa, H., & Yoshimura, Y. (2015). Introduction of MMG standard method for ship maneuvering predictions. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 20(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-014-0293-y

Yoshimura, Y., & Masumoto, Y. (2012). Hydrodynamic force database with medium high-speed merchant ships including fishing vessels and investigation into a manoeuvring prediction method. Journal of the Japan Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers, 14, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.2534/jjasnaoe.14.63

Downloads

Published

14-08-2026

How to Cite

Santoso, A. R., & Ayub, F. A. (2026). Ship Manuvering Analysis Using Virtual Captive Model Test On Trim And Sinkage Variations . Applied Science and Technology on Naval Engineering, 4(2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.54378/astne.v4i2v2.05

Issue

Section

Articles