ANALISIS DASAR PERTIMBANGAN MAJELIS HAKIM DAN IMPLIKASI ATAS PENGABULAN GUGATAN CERAI OLEH PENGADILAN AGAMA JAKARTA TIMUR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT)
Keywords:
Divorce Lawsuit, Judicial Consideration, Borken Mariage, Talak Ba'in Sughra, Relegious CourtAbstract
Divorce is a form of resolving marital disputes that may only be granted when the legal grounds stipulated by law have been fulfilled. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the panel of judges in granting a divorce petition and its legal implications in Decision Number 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches. The findings indicate that the panel of judges granted the divorce petition due to continuous disputes and conflicts, the husband's failure to fulfill his financial support obligations, the defendant's involvement in online loans, and the parties' separation for more than two years. These considerations were based on Article 39 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law in conjunction with Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 and Article 116 letter (f) of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The decision resulted in the dissolution of the marriage through a talak satu ba'in sughra. Although formally consistent with applicable legal provisions, the decision still raises concerns regarding the quality of evidence, the default judgment procedure (verstek), and the insufficient protection of women's rights and the best interests of children after divorce.
Keywords: Divorce Lawsuit, Judicial Considerations, Broken Marriage, Talak Ba'in Sughra, Religious Court.
Downloads
References
Ayu, A.S.M., dan Fatmawati, I. “Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham dalam Filsafat Hukum: Analisis terhadap Konsep Kebahagiaan sebagai Tujuan Hukum.” NUJEEL: Nusantara Journal of Education, Technology and Law 1, no.1 (2025).
Fauzan, M. “Asas Mempersulit Perceraian dalam Sistem Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia.” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 1 (2022): 71-87.
Fikriah, S.S. dan Suyaman, P., (2026). “Legal Reasoning Hakim terhadap Penerimaan Saksi Testimonium De Auditu dalam Perkara Perceraian.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(3), hlm.6882-6888.
Hasanah, N., Aziz, A., dan Puspitasari, N. “Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Perceraian Akibat Broken Marriage Melalui Pendekatan Maslahah Mursalah: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Cibinong.” JIM-HKI-STAINI, 1(1), 2023, hlm. 49–66.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan. Cetakan ke-18. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Timur Nomor 5374/Pdt.G/2025/PA.JT.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 237 K/AG/1998 tanggal 17 Maret 1999.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemberlakuan Rumusan Hasil Rapat Pleno Kamar Mahkamah Agung sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Tugas bagi Pengadilan.
Manan, Abdul. Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana, 2021.
Muda, L.I., (2025). “Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Putusan Perceraian karena Perselisihan Rumah Tangga (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Praya).” Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 5(2), hllm.1352-1367.
Republik Indonesia, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Republik Indonesia, Kompilasi Hukum Islam
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan Berhadapan dengan Hukum.
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.
Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Rofiah, Nur. Nalar Kritis Muslimah: Refleksi atas Keperempuanan, Kemanusiaan, dan Keislaman. Cetakan ke-3. Bandung: Afkaruna, 2021.
Rahma Dani, L.N., (2022). “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Kasus Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) Yang Mengakibatkan Perceraian Berdasarkan Kompilasi Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Jember).”(Doctoral dissertation, UIN KH Achmad Siddiq Jember).
Purnama, A.K.D., Hudoyo, A.A.S., Zulfani, S., dan Faturahman, D.T. “Pengaruh Pinjaman Online sebagai Faktor Pemicu Terjadinya Perceraian: Studi Kasus Nomor 243/Pdt.G/2025/PA.CN.” JAKSA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik, no. 3 (2025): 35–43.
Taufik, Muhammad, dan Nurul Huda. “Ratio Decidendi Hakim dalam Putusan Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Al-Ahwal 15, no. 2 (2022): 195-210.
Wibisono, Y., Kuswanto, K. and Husain, M.A., (2025). “Permasalahan Dan Penyebab Perceraian (Studi Kasus Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Jombang).” Justicia Journal, 14(1), pp.52-74.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Hukum Statuta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
