THE VALIDITY OF AMP EXPENDITURE AS AN INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF BEAM GLOBAL IN INDIA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INDONESIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v12i2.13221

Keywords:

Transfer pricing, AMP expenses, Bright Line Test, OECD Guidelines, International taxation.

Abstract

This study examines the legal validity of advertising, marketing, and promotion expenses as international transactions in transfer pricing disputes through the case of Beam Global Spirits & Wine Pvt. Ltd. Using a normative juridical approach and case study method, the analysis focuses on Indian court decisions, Sections 92B and 92F of the Indian Income Tax Act, and the 2022 OECD TPG. The key findings show that the Bright Line Test lacks legal basis and does not reflect the economic substance of the transactions. The Delhi High Court ruled that transfer pricing adjustments are valid only when an international transaction is proven and analyzed using legally recognized methods. The study concludes that the Bright Line Test is inconsistent with domestic law and OECD principles, emphasizing the importance of functional analysis. For Indonesia, this case highlights the need for regulatory reform, improved documentation, and evidence‑based approaches to ensure fairness and legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdallah, Wagdy M. Critical Concerns in Transfer Pricing and Practice. Critical Concerns in Transfer Pricing and Practice. Seton Hall University, United States: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2004.

Burgstaller, Iris. “ESG Transformation and Transfer Pricing Implications.” International Transfer Pricing Journal 2022, no. 1 (2022): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.59403/sf1x26.

Büttner, Tim, and Matthias Thiemann. “Breaking Regime Stability? The Politicization of Expertise in the OECD/G20 Process on BEPS and the Potential Transformation of International Taxation.” Accounting, Economics and Law 7, no. 1 (May 24, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2016-0069.

Dwindahany, Cut Sarah, and Subagio Efendi. “Should Excessive Marketing Expenses Be Remunerated? Lessons From Indonesia’S Tax Court Decisions.” Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah 15, no. 1 (July 9, 2024): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v15i1.26915.

Freire, Felipe Thé. “Economic Substance for Holding Companies in the Post-BEPS World and after Recent ECJ Case-Law: An Analysis of Developments in Europe.” Intertax 51, no. 1 (2023): 33–50. https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023002.

Ganzen, Bastiaan van, Dirk Broekhuijsen, and Henk Vording. “Contract Theory as a Guide to Fairness in Tax Treaties.” In Fairness in International Taxation, 31–54. Institute of Tax Law, Economics of Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2025. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509968107.ch-002.

Gurinovich, Alexander Georgievich, and Alexey Alimovich Shakhmametiev. “Approaches to the Optimization of Fiscal Regulations in Cross-Border Transactions for the Provision of Electronic Services.” Juridicas CUC 20, no. 1 (2023): 131–56. https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.20.1.2024.05.

Ignat, Ioana, and Liliana Ionescu-Feleagă. “Transfer Pricing Regulations: An International Approach.” Contributions to Finance and Accounting Part F219 (2022): 21–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93889-5_2.

Irwansyah. Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode Dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Edited by Ahsan Yunus. Cet-4. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.

Kumar, Ajay. “Making International Tax Law: Analysing Tax Jurisprudence in India.” In Locating India in the Contemporary International Legal Order, 127–48. University of Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates: Springer India, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3580-4_7.

Li, Jinyan. “Soft Law, Hard Realities and Pragmatic Suggestions: Critiquing the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.” In Fundamentals of International Transfer Pricing in Law and Economics, 71–89. Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25980-7_5.

Moreira, Clara Gomes. “M. L. Gomes, The Principal Purpose Test in the Multilateral Instrument, Lumen Juris, 2021.” Intertax 50, no. 4 (2022): 385–86.

Navarro, Aitor. “Fundamentals of Transfer Pricing. A Practical Guide, M. Lang, G. Cottani, R. Petruzzi & A. Storck (Editors), Kluwer Law International, 2019.” Intertax 47, no. 12 (December 1, 2019): 1125–27. https://doi.org/10.54648/TAXI2019115.

Ozai, Ivan. “Policy Forum: Judicial Line Drawing and Implications for Tax Avoidance.” Canadian Tax Journal 71, no. 4 (2023): 1053–68. https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2023.71.4.pf.ozai.

Petkova, Kunka, and Stefan Greil. “Simplifying Transfer Pricing through a Risk-Based Approach: A Unilateral Proposal to Reduce Administrative and Compliance Costs.” Bulletin for International Taxation 79, no. 1 (2025): 2–14. https://doi.org/10.59403/49dy9r.

Rollins, Samantha M. “Isn’t It Obvious? How Klein’s Definition of Analogous Prior Art Conflicts with the Supreme Court’s Vision for Obviousness.” Iowa Law Review 98, no. 3 (2013): 1377–97. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2033993.

Rossing, Christian Plesner, and Carsten Rohde. “Transfer Pricing: Aligning the Research Agenda to Organizational Reality.” Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change 10, no. 3 (2014): 266–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-03-2012-0017.

Schön, Wolfgang. “Transfer Pricing – Business Incentives, International Taxation and Corporate Law.” In Fundamentals of International Transfer Pricing in Law and Economics, 47–67. Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance, Department of Business and Tax Law, Munich, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25980-7_4.

Sengupta, D. P. “India.” In The Impact of the OECD and UN Model Conventions on Bilateral Tax Treaties, 549–97. Ministry of Finance, Competent Authority for India, India: Cambridge University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139095686.020.

Shanan, Tamir, and Doron Narotzki. “Taxation of Cross Border Migrations: Re-Evaluating the Allocation between Home Country and Host Country.” In Fairness in International Taxation, 172–92. Haim Striks Faculty of Law, College of Management Academic Studies, Israel: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc., 2025. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509968107.ch-008.

Singhania, Monica. “Analyzing Indian Transfer Pricing Regulations: A Case Study.” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 40 (2010): 203–14.

Slater, A. G. “International Transfer Pricing.” Management Decision 15, no. 6 (June 1, 1977): 550–60. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb001146.

Solilová, Veronika. “Revised OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines and the Czech Tax Policy.” Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 59, no. 4 (2011): 301–8. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159040301.

Valderrama, Irma Johanna Mosquera. “BEPS Principal Purpose Test and Customary International Law.” Leiden Journal of International Law 33, no. 3 (September 27, 2020): 745–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156520000278.

Vanderbruggen, Edwin. “The Effectiveness of Multilateral Approaches to International Tax Cooperation: The Case of Vietnam and the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines.” Manchester Journal of International Economic Law 21, no. 3 (2024): 299–329.

Vare, Todd, and Michael Wever. “A Divided Federal Circuit Resolves Divided Induced Infringement of Method Claims.” Nanotechnology Law and Business 9, no. 3 (2012): 309–11.

Wilkie, J. Scott. “Reflecting on the ‘Arm’s Length Principle’: What Is the ‘Principle’? Where Next?” In Fundamentals of International Transfer Pricing in Law and Economics, 137–56. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25980-7_8.

Zschorsch, Klaus Dieter. “Catalytic Combustion.” In The John Zink Hamworthy Combustion Handbook, Second Edition: Volume 1 - Fundamentals, edited by Wim Helwegen and Luca Escoffier, 137–57. Foresight Valuation Group LLC, 260 Sheridan Ave., Palo Alto, 94306, CA, United States: Pan Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd., 2012. https://doi.org/10.1201/b11619.

Published

2026-03-12

How to Cite

Suharsono, A. (2026). THE VALIDITY OF AMP EXPENDITURE AS AN INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION: A CASE STUDY OF BEAM GLOBAL IN INDIA AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INDONESIA. Jurnal Yuridis, 12(2), 361–381. https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v12i2.13221