Kesejahteraan Sosial dalam Persepektif Demokrasi dan Otoritarian: Analisis Perbandingan Inggris dan Singapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33822/jpds.v4i2.6192Kata Kunci:
kebijakan kesejahteraan sosial, demokrasi, otoritarian, Inggris, SingapuraAbstrak
Terdapat keterkaitan antara kesejahteraan, negara kesejahteraan dan kebijakan kesejahteraan sosial dalam perspektif demokrasi dan otoritarian. Keberhasilan kebijakan kesejahteraan sosial tidak hanya di negara demokrasi Inggris melainkan juga negara otoritarian Singapura. Keberadaan Inggris dan Singapura sebagai negara kesejahteraan telah menjadi bukti empiris globalisasi konsep ini ke seluruh negara di dunia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan analisis komparatif studi kasus Inggris dan Singapura. Hasil penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwa terdapat persamaan antara Inggris dan Singapura sebagai negara kesejahteraan kapitalis (welfare capitalism) dalam mengimplementasikan kebijakan sosial. Sementara perbedaan antara keduanya terfokus pada pendekatan yang dijalankan sebagai negara kesejahteraan. Keberhasilan kebijakan sosial di Inggris dilakukan dengan pendekatan sistem/strukturalis. Sementara di Singapura keberhasilan penerapan kebijakan sosial lebih dijalankan melalui pendekatan institusional.
Referensi
Afriansyah, Anggi. 2016. “Tinjauan Buku Jatuh Bangun Singapura Membangun Bangsa: Suatu Perbandingan.” Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia 42(2): 2–3.
Altemeyer, Bob. 2006. XXXIII University of Mannitoba The Authoritarians. Winnipeg: University of Mannitoba. http://www.americanbanker.com/issues/179_124/which-city-is-the-next-big-fintech-hub-new-york-stakes-its-claim-1068345-1.html%5Cnhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15003161%5Cnhttp://cid.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/cid/cir991%5Cnhttp://www.scielo.
Andersen, Gosta Esping. 1990. 70 Polity Press The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Antriksa, Febbie Ardilla. 2014. “Demokrasi Semu Di Singapura, Pada Masa Pemerintahan Lee Kuan Yew (1959 -1990).” Jurnal Hubungan Internasional 1(2): 6.
Armingeon, Klaus, and Michelle Beyeler. 2004. “The OECD and European Welfare States.” The OECD and European Welfare States: 1–253.
Aspalter, Cristien. 2001. “Different Worlds of Welfare Capitalism : Australia, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Hong Kong and Singpore.” (80): 1–20.
Bagehot, Walter. 2001. The English Constitution. ed. Miles Taylor. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
Bangun, Budi Hermawan. 2019. “Perbandingan Sistem Dan Mekanisme HAM Negara-Negara Anggota Asean: Tinjauan Konstitusi Dan Kelembagaan.” Jurnal HAM 10(1): 99.
Bartholomew, James. 2006. The Welfare State We’re In. Rosendale: Politico’s Publishing Ltd.
Beasley, Chris. 2005. Gender and Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers Gender & Sexuality: Critical Theories, Critical Thinkers.
Beetham, David. 1999. Democracy and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Choon, Chia Ngee. 2010. “Social Protection in Singapore: Targeted Welfare and Asset-Based Social Security.” Socail Proction in East Asia-Current State and Challenges (March): 90–123.
Churchill, Winston. 2005. Barnes & Noble, Inc The Birth of Britain. United State of America: Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Citradi, Tirta. 2020. “Duh! Indeks Pembangunan Manusia RI Nomor 107 Dari 189 Negara.” cnbcindonesia.com. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20201216142816-4-209558.
Connor, Kelsey J O. 2017. “Happiness and Welfare State Policy Around t He World.” Review of Behavioral Economics 4(December 2017): 397–420.
Cummins, R. A., Land, K. C. 2017. “Capabilities, Subjective Wellbeing and Public Policy: A Response to Austin.” Social Indicators Research 140(1): 157–173.
Daly, Mary. 2013. Welfare. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Deeming, Chris, and David Hayes. 2012. “Worlds of Welfare Capitalism and Wellbeing: A Multilevel Analysis.” Journal of Social Policy 41(4): 811–29.
Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Maryland: JHU Press.
Einhorn, Eric S., and John Logue. 2003. Modern Welfare States : Scandinavian Politics and Policy in the Global Age. the United States of America: Praeger.
Fitzpatrick, Tony. 2011. Welfare Theory: An Introduction to the Theoretical Debates in Social Policy. Second. London: Red Globe Press.
Fraser, Derek. 1973. Evolution of British Welfare State: A History of Social Policy since the Industrial Revolution. New York: THE MACMILLAN PRESS LTD.
Friedrich, Carl Joachim & Zbigniew K. Brzezinski. 1965. Harvard University Press Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fromm, Erich. 1942. The Fear of Freedom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul LTD.
Garland, David. 2016. Oxford University Press The Welfare State: A Very Short Introduction. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press Inc.
George, Vic. 2010. Major Thinkers in Welfare: Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective Major Thinkers in Welfare: Contemporary Issues in Historical Perspective. United Kingdom: The Policy Press.
Gutmann, Amy. 1988. Democracy and the Welfare State. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Hadiyono, V. 2020. “Indonesia Dalam Menjawab Konsep Negara Welfare State Dan Tatangannya.” Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Kekuasaan 1(1): 23.
Haggard, Stephan and, and Robert R. Kaufman. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States in Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hairi, Muhammad Imam Akbar. 2016. “Sistem Pemerintahan Soft-Autoritharian Singapura Di Tengah Arus Demokrasi.” Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik 1(2): 1–5.
Han, Heejin. 2017. “Singapore, a Garden City: Authoritarian Environmentalism in a Developmental State.” Journal of Environment and Development 26(1): 3–24.
Harris, Bernard. 2004. The Origins of the British Welfare State: Society, State and Social Welfare in England and Wales, 1800-1945. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hartati, Anna Yulia. 2018. “Asian Values Di Singapura (Studi Tentang Peran Konfusianisme Dalam Kemajuan Politik Singapura).” Sosio Dialektika 3(1): 1–21.
Holliday, Ian. 2000. “Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia.” Political Studies 48(4): 706–23.
Hulme, A. Barrientos, D, ed. 2008. Social Protection for the Poor and Poorest: Concepts, Policies and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hwee, Yeo Lay. 2002. “Electoral Politics in Singapore.” In Electoral Politics in Southeast & East Asia, ed. Aurel Croissant. Singapore: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
Javaid, Arfa. 2022. “Democracy Index 2021: Check the Top and Bottom Nations, Highest-Ranked Region in the World, India Rank, and More.” jagranjosh.com. https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/democracy-index-2021-1644567197-1.
Kersbergen, Van, Kees Van Kersbergen, and Kjersti Metliaas. 2020. “Radical Alternative Conceptualizations of the Classical Welfare State? Contrasting the United Kingdom and the Netherlands with Norway.” Social and Policy Administration 54 (5)(October 2016): 813–26.
Khan, Habibullah. 2001. “Social Policy in Singapore: A Confucian Model?”
Knijn, Trudie, and Monique Kremer. 1997. “Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship.” Social Politics 4(3): 328–61.
Lauzadyte-Tutliene, et al. 2018. “Welfare State in Central and Eastern Europe.” Economics and Sociology 11(1): 100–123.
Lees, Lynn Hollen. 1998. The Solidarities of Strangers: The English Poor Laws and the People, 1700-1948. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=D4Ewqqy2C9sC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=Worthy+Poor+and+Unworthy+Poor+in+England&ots=bLtn3NHSVi&sig=vKCb1Un-hO3pnRXa6RzpdMOBL1w&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Worthy Poor and Unworthy Poor in England&f=false.
Levy, Frank, and William Julius Wilson. 1989. 8 Journal of Policy Analysis and Management The Truly Disadvantaged.
Maravall, Jos´e Mar´ıa and Przeworski, Adam. 2003. Democracy and the Rule of Law. ed. Adam Maravall, Jos´e Mar´ıa and Przeworski. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marsland, David. 1996. Welfare or Welfare State?: Contradictions and Dilemmas in Social Policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Martha, Jessica, Arry Bainus, and Dudi Heryadi. 2014. “Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Demokrasi Terhadap Kesejahteraan: Teori Dan Realita (Studi Kasus: Indonesia).” Pengaruh Pelaksanaan Demokrasi Terhadap Kesejahteraan: Teori Dan Realita (Studi Kasus: Indonesia) 14. http://www.ysps.am/index.php?id=52&m=18.
Marume, S.B.M. 2016. “Public Policy and Factors Influencing Public Policy.” International Journal of Engineering Science Invention 5(6): 6–14.
McQuoid Mason, David. 2005. Democracy for All: Education Towards a Democratic Culture. Kenwyn: Juta & Co Ltd.
Midgley, James. 2017. Social Welfare for a Global Era: International Perspectives on Policy and Practice. California: Sage Publication, Inc.
Munck, Gerardo L. 2016. “What Is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy.” Democratization 23(1): 1–26.
Nazir, Mohammad. 2014. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Ng, Irene Y.H. 2012. 15 Social Welfare in Singapore: Rediscovering Poverty, Reshaping Policy. Singapore. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/196255896.pdf.
Ober, Josiah. 2007. Princeton/Stanford Working Papers in Classics The The Original Meaning of “Democracy”: Capacity to Do Things, Not Majority Rule.
Pennings, Paul, Hans Keman, and Jan Kleinnijenhuis. 2006. Doing Research in Political Science Doing Research in Political Science. London: SAGE Publications.
Phang, Sock Yong. 2007. “The Singapore Model of Housing and the Welfare State.” Research Collection School Of Economics: 15–44.
Pop-Radu, I. 2014. “The European Welfare Model. Is Romania a Welfare State?!” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. 7 (56)(1): 171–78.
Pristiandaru, Danur Lambang. 2022. “Daftar Negara Maju Dan Negara Berkembang Di Asia.” internasional.kompas.com: 1. https://internasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/07/123100170/daftar-negara-maju-dan-negara-berkembang-di-asia.
Ratih, Dina. 2021. “Hubungan Antara Demokrasi Dan Kesejahteraan Warga Di Eropa : Analisis European.” Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik (JIAP) 7(2): 306–18.
Reeves, Rachel and McIvor, Martin. 2014. “Clement Attlee and the Foundations of the British Welfare State.” Renewal 22(3/4): 42–59.
Rønning, Rolf and Knutagard, Marcus. 2015. Innovation in Social Welfare and Human Services. New York: Routledge.
Sartori, Giovanni. 1965. Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne University Press.
Slack, Paul. 1990. The English Poor Law 1531-1782. London: Macmillan Press Ltd. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203.
Sodaro, Michael J. 2004. Comparative Politics: A Global Introduction. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Stebe, Janez. 2015. “Support for Democracy and Meanings of Democracy : Equality and Freedom.” Teorija in Praksa 3(49)(September): 601–2.
Stephens, J. D. 1995. “The Scandinavian Welfare States: Achievements, Crisis and Prospects.” Discussion Paper - United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 67(June).
Titmuss, Richard. 2018. Essays on the Welfare State. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
Ulfelder, Jay. 2005. “Contentious Collective Action and the Breakdown of Authoritarian Regimes.” International Political Science Review 26(3): 311–34.
Ulhaq, Zulvikar Syambani dan Mayu Rahmayanti. 2020. Panduan Penulisan Skripsi Literatur Review. Malang: Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Veenhoven, Ruut. 2000. “Wellbeing in The Welfare State: Level Not Higher , Distribution Not More Equitable.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 2: 91–125.
Watts, Duncan. 2003. Understanding US/UK Government and Politics: A Comparative Guide. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.
———. 2006. British Government and Politics: A Comparative Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
White, Gordon and Goodman, Roger. 1999. 58 The Journal of Asian Studies The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. ed. Huck-ju Goodman, Roger; White, Gordon; and Kwon. London and New Delhi: Routledge.
Wong, Reuben, and Wong Meng Ee. 2015. “Social Impact of Policies for the Disabled in Singapore.” 50 Years of Social Issues in Singapore (October): 147–66.
Wronowska, Gabriela. 2015. “Welfare and Higher Education in EU Member States – Comparative Analysis.” Oeconomia Copernicana 6(1): 33–45.
Yerli, Kenan. 2020. “The Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601 as a Result of Socio-Political and Economic Conditions of the Sixteenth Century England.” Turkish Journal of Applied Social Work 3(1): 88–99.
