NAVIGATING REGIONAL COMPETITION: THE COMPETITIVENESS OF INDONESIA’S MSMES IN THE ASEAN MARKET
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33822/mjihi.v8i2.12525Keywords:
ASEAN Economic Community (AEC), regional interdependence, MSME competitiveness, economic liberalizationAbstract
The establishment of the ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) marks a significant milestone in Southeast Asia’s regional integration efforts, driving economic liberalization, free trade, and cross-border investment flows. Within this dynamic regional environment, Indonesia’s Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs)—which serve as the backbone of the national economy—face both vast opportunities and complex challenges. This study explores how ASEAN’s economic liberalization has opened new market access, strengthened technological collaboration, and fostered cross-border investment linkages, while simultaneously intensifying competition among enterprises across member states. Using liberalism theory in international relations as an analytical framework, this research argues that ASEAN’s economic interdependence produces a dual effect: on one hand, it enhances growth potential through cooperation, but on the other, it exposes structural weaknesses among MSMEs that lack competitiveness. Furthermore, this study examines the institutional role of ASEAN, particularly in enhancing MSME competitiveness through policy harmonization, capacity building, and digital transformation initiatives. Through mechanisms such as best-practice sharing and policy benchmarking, ASEAN institutions contribute to narrowing development gaps among member states and supporting inclusive regional growth. The findings highlight that the competitiveness of Indonesia’s MSMEs in the ASEAN market is determined not only by domestic innovation and efficiency but also by the collective institutional strength of ASEAN in promoting a balanced, open, and cooperative regional economy.
References
Asian Development Bank. (2020). ASEAN and global value chains: Locking in resilience and sustainability. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asean-and-global-value-chains
Asian Development Bank. (2022). Asia SME monitor 2022: Indonesia country report. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asia-sme-monitor-2022-indonesia
ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). ASEAN economic community blueprint 2025. Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat. Retrieved from https://asean.org/book/asean-economic-community-blueprint-2025/
Chia, S. Y. (2013). The ASEAN economic community: Progress, challenges, and prospects. ADBI Working Paper Series No. 440. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asean-economic-community-progress-challenges-and-prospects
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Dent, C. M. (2008). East Asian regionalism. London: Routledge.
Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). (2021). ASEAN integration report 2021. Jakarta: ERIA. Retrieved from https://www.eria.org/publications/asean-integration-report-2021/
FEM IPB. (2021). Kontribusi UMKM terhadap ekspor nasional Indonesia. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from https://fem.ipb.ac.id
Keohane, R. O. (1984). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2021). Laporan tahunan UMKM dan ekspor nasional. Jakarta: Kemenkop UKM.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
Nesadurai, H. E. S. (2003). Globalisation, domestic politics, and regionalism: The ASEAN free trade area. London: Routledge.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). SME and entrepreneurship policy in Indonesia 2018. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264306264-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Strengthening SMEs and entrepreneurship for productivity and inclusive growth. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/publications/strengthening-smes-and-entrepreneurship-9789264303072-en.htm
OECD, ERIA, & ASEAN. (2018). ASEAN SME policy index 2018: Boosting competitiveness and inclusive growth. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305328-en
PhilStar Global. (2021, March 15). DTI: MSMEs contribute 25% of total exports. PhilStar Global. Retrieved from https://www.philstar.com/business/2021/03/15/2084422/dti-msmes-contribute-25-total-exports
Ravenhill, J. (2014). Global political economy (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Severino, R. C., & Menon, J. (2017). ASEAN@50: Achievements and challenges in regional integration and community building. Manila: Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/publications/asean50-achievements-challenges-regional-integration
Severino, R. C., & Menon, J. (2017). The ASEAN economic community: A work in progress. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
SME Corporation Malaysia. (2023). SME annual report 2022/2023: Advancing MSMEs through digitalisation. Kuala Lumpur: SME Corp Malaysia. Retrieved from https://www.smecorp.gov.my
The World Bank. (2019). Thailand SME promotion policy review. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/publication/thailand-sme-promotion-policy-review
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lini Ingriyani, Rizki Marman Saputra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


