IMPLEMENTASI HAL ASASI MANUSIA INTERNASIONAL DALAM PEMENUHAN ASAS MEMBERSHIP OLEH MYANMAR KEPADA ETNIS ROHINGYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33822/jpds.v3i2.6188Kata Kunci:
Rohingya, Myanmar, Pelanggaran HAMAbstrak
The state is obliged to ensure that every citizen gets basic rights, however, in practice the state can fail to fulfill the basic rights of citizens. In Myanmar, cases of human rights violations have occurred for years, namely cases of human rights violations against the Rohingya. Current developments, the Rohingya are still in refugee camps in Bangladesh, because the Myanmar government has not given a sign to accept the Rohingyas back. The research methodology used is qualitative observation with a literature study approach. The observations used in our research use natural setting theory which aims to explore and explore in depth a meaning or problem. During the time the researcher made observations, the research understood and rewrote material related to important and interesting events or phenomena in the context of our group's research. The Rohingya group experienced discrimination from the government and civil society of Myanmar, namely in the form of restrictions on the right to marry and have children, not providing birth certificates, to destroying school buildings as well as mosques and prayer rooms. Myanmar also has the 1982 Citizenship Act to revoke Rohingya citizenship. Myanmar fulfills two important elements in the Internationally Wrongful Act, namely violations of international obligations and these actions can be attributed to Myanmar. The first settlement effort is through the establishment of the International Criminal Court to reconcile human rights violations. Second, efforts to determine the fate of the Rohingya ethnicity in terms of international law, researchers propose that Myanmar provide a membership principle, so that they gain access to education, the economy, and health or the Myanmar government can provide options for the Rohingya ethnic group to continue to join on condition that they are granted special autonomy or grant independence in a voluntary manner. absolute to them.
Referensi
Miles, M.B & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, C.A.: SAGE Publications Inc.
Johnson, B & Chirstensen, L. 2004. Educational Research Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Boston: Pearson
Creswell, J.W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks California: SAGE Publications.
Bellamy. Richard. 2008. Citizenship. A very Short Introduction.
Mangku. Dewa Gede Sudika. 2013. Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Etnis Rohingya : Dalam Perspektif ASEAN. Media Komunikasi FIS Vol 12, No 2 Agustus. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Tri Wahyuningsih, Susani. "Perlindungan dan penegakan hak asasi manusia (ham) di indonesia." Legal Standing: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2.2 (2018): 113-121.
Thontowi, J. (2013). Perlakuan Pemerintah Myanmar terhadap Minoritas Muslim Rohingya Perspektif Sejarah dan Hukum Internasional. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 8(1).
Mangku, D. G. S. (2021). Pemenuhan Hak Asasi Manusia kepada Etnis Rohingya di Myanmar. Perspektif Hukum, 1-15.
Ebbighausen, R. (2022, Agustus 24). Tidak Ada Perspektif bagi Warga Muslim Rohingya di Myanmar. DW.com. https://www.dw.com/id/tidak-ada-perspektif-bagi-warga-rohingya-di-myanmar/a-62913650
Liputan6.com. (2022, Oktober 28). MUI Dorong Perdamaian Palestina dan Isu Pengungsi Rohingya dalam G20. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/islami/read/5109346/mui-dorong-perdamaian-palestina-dan-isu-pengungsi-rohingya-dalam-g20
Deklarasi Universal Hak Asasi Manusia.
Piagam Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa. Konvensi Montevideo Tahun 1933.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Draft Deklarasi PBB tentang HakHak dan Kewajiban Negara Tahun 1949
Anggara. (2005,). Hak Menentukan Nasib Sendiri (The Rights To self Determination) dalam hukum Internasional ( Tinjauan Terhadap Pelaksanaan Penentuan Pendapat Rakyat di Papua Barat tahun 1969, Vol. III, No. I.
Anggara. (n.d.). Op. Cit.
(1970). Barcelona Traction, Light and Power. Second Phase, Judgment,.
Begem, S. S. (2019). Sistem Hukum Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 1-17.
Brown, R. L. (2020). Rohingya Ruling: How A Tiny African Country Brought Myanmar To Court. Retrieved from https://www.csmonitor.com/a/2020/02/13/R
(1995). Case Concerning East Timor (Portugal v.
Cucino, M. A. (2015). Referendum dan Kemerdekaan Timor Leste1999-2002. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 37-40.
Dijk, P. B. (: 2006). Instrumen Internasional Pokok Hak Asasi Manusia. (A. B. Zen, Trans.) Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Green, P. M. (2018). Achieved, Genocide Continues: Myanmmar Annihilation of the Rohingnya. London: : International State Crime Initiative.
Human Rights Council. (2018). Report of The Independent International Fact - Finding Mission on Myanmar.
ILC. (1996). Draft Article International Law Commission.
Kusumo, A. T. (2014). Optimalisasi Peran ICC dan Aplikasi Kemanusiaan Sebagai Inisiasi Penyelesaian Kasus Rohingya. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol.14, (No.3), p. 529.
Thantowi, J. (2013). Perlakuan Pemerintah Myanmar Terhadap Minoritas Muslim Rohingnya. Jurnal Pandecta, Vol.8, (No.1), p. 44.
