Kemandirian dalam Sejarah Lembaga Independen Indonesia: Kontestasi Kelembagaan Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) Republik Indonesia 1998–2024

Evi Novida Ginting Manik; Azhari M Latief; Fredick Broven Ekayanta

doi:10.33822/jpds.v7i2.14428

Authors

Evi Novida Ginting Manik Universitas Sumatera Utara
Azhari M Latief Universitas Sumatera Utara
Fredick Broven Ekayanta Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/jpds.v7i2.14428

Abstract

Although regulatory reforms have strengthened the institutional position of Indonesia’s General Elections Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum, KPU) as a national, permanent, and independent electoral management body, contestation over the boundaries of its independence in relation to the House of Representatives (DPR) and the government continues to shape electoral governance in Indonesia. This persistent contestation suggests that KPU independence cannot be understood merely as a normative status guaranteed by the Constitution. This study examines how the concept of mandiri (independent) in Article 22E(5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia emerged through a political process and how its historical formation has shaped the institutional development of the KPU through the 2024 elections. Drawing on Historical Institutionalism, particularly the concepts of critical juncture and path dependency, the study analyzes records of the constitutional amendment debates, laws and regulations, Constitutional Court decisions, and in-depth interviews with actors involved in the constitutional amendment process and KPU commissioners who served during the 2017–2022 and 2022–2027 terms. The findings demonstrate that the term mandiri emerged from a political compromise in which it replaced the term independent during the constitutional amendment process. This conceptual ambiguity was subsequently reproduced through regulatory changes, commissioner recruitment mechanisms, and the KPU’s institutional relations with the DPR and the government, thereby sustaining contestation over the boundaries of its independence. Theoretically, the study demonstrates that path dependency does not necessarily produce institutional stability; it may also reproduce institutional contestation. The findings further highlight the limitations of legal-formal approaches that conceptualize the independence of electoral management bodies as a static institutional attribute.

References

Alasuutari, P. (2015). The Discursive Side of New Institutionalism. Cultural Sociology, 9(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975514561805

Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara pasca Reformasi. Sekretariat Jenderal Kemitraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id

Catt, Helena., Ellis, Andrew., Maley, Michael., Wall, Alan., & Wolf, Peter. (2014). Electoral Management Design. International IDEA, Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.

Cheeseman, N., & Elklit, J. (2020). Understanding and Assessing Electoral Commission Independence: a New Framework.

Clark, J. G. (2017). The Legal Framework: The Context for an Electoral Management Body (EMB)’S Role and Powers. International Journal of Research in Education, 3(2).

Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and Three New Institutionalisms. http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de

Huntington, S. P. (1991). The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century.

Jaffrey, S., & Warburton, E. (2024). Indonesia On The Edge of Competitive Authoritarianism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 60(3), 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2024.2426571

Lane, M. (2020). Indonesian Politics After the Widodo-Prabowo Rapprochement. (2).

Mangar, I., & Rosyid, R. (2022). Lembaga Independen Negara dalam Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Agama Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1557/djash.v1i2.18040

Martins, O. L. (2024). Independence National Electoral Commission and 2019 General Elections in Nigeria: Election Monitoring and Observation. Canadian Social Science, 20(4), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.3968/13505

Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian Populism Jokowi’s Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia.

Mochtar, Z. A. (2016). Lembaga Negara Independen: Dinamika Perkembangan dan Urgensi Penataannya Kembali Pasca-Amandemen Konstitusi. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Muhtadi, B. (2015). Jokowi’s First Year: A Weak President Caught between Reform and Oligarchic Politics. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1110684

Nazriyah, R. (2011). Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum, 18(3), 107–126.

Pasaribu, A. (2019). Tafsir Konstitusional atas Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilu dan Pilkada. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk16210

Ramadani, R. (2020). Lembaga Negara Independen Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Konsep Independent Regulatory Agencies. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss1.art9

Rhodes, R. A. W., Binder, S. A., & Rockman, B. A. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions.

Santoso, T., & Budhiati, I. (2019). Pemilu di Indonesia (Tarmizi, Ed.; 1st ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change Through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism.’ European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X

Sobari, W. (2024). Analisis Institusionalisme Baru dalam Ilmu Politik (1st ed.). Lakeisha. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24998330.v1

Surbakti, R. (2024). Tata Kelola Pemilu (1st ed.). Kompas.

Ugoh, S. C., & Ukpere, W. I. (2019). Assessment of Electoral Management and Democratization System in Nigeria: A Case of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). In Journal of Reviews on Global Economics (Vol. 8).

Wall, A., Ellis, A., Ayman Ayoub, Carl W. Dundas, Joram Rukambe, & Sara Staino. (2016). Desain Penyelenggaraan Pemilu: Buku Pedoman Internasional.