Peer Review Process

Each submitted manuscript will undergo a peer review (double-blind review) by 2 (two) expert reviewers. Double-blind review is a manuscript review method where the authors do not know the reviewers who examine the submitted manuscripts, and the reviewers do not know the authors of the manuscripts they review. In short, both reviewers and authors maintain the confidentiality of each other's identities. The review process is conducted online by the reviewers, and the results will be communicated to the authors via email.

Each submitted article will go through the following editorial process before publication:

1. Pre-Review
2. Review
3. Post-Review

The editorial process uses Turnitin as a tool for plagiarism checks. If major similarity is indicated, the manuscript will be rejected.

The review results can be acceptance without revision, acceptance with minor revisions, acceptance with major revisions, or manuscript rejection. The maximum review time is 2 (two) months after manuscript submission.

The final decision will be made by the editor, taking into account comments from the reviewers. Accepted articles with revisions are expected to make the necessary revisions according to the provided notes within the timeframe determined by the editorial team.