Navigating Asymmetric Interdependence: Actor Typology and Sectoral Preferences in East Java’s Economic Paradiplomacy (2024–2025)

Authors

  • Fatimah Tammy Assegaff Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Slamet Muliono Redjosari Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/mjihi.v9i1.14407

Keywords:

Complex Interdependence, Economic Paradiplomacy, East Java, Global Value Chains

Abstract

Paradiplomacy has emerged as a useful tool employed by subnational governments in addressing the demands and possibilities of interdependence in today’s world. Thus, this research seeks to examine the typology of international actors, patterns of sectoral preferences, and dimensions of interdependence affecting the economic paradiplomacy of East Java province during the period of 2024-2025. By applying a qualitative approach and analyzing documents such as the LKPJ of East Java governor and BPS statistics, this paper is able to establish patterns of global economic engagement in terms of trade and foreign investments in East Java. The findings reveal that the economic paradiplomacy of the region is still dominated by the involvement of East Java with other countries under the state paradigm, especially with Switzerland, China, and the United States. Furthermore, sectoral preferences are focused on traditional comparative advantage in terms of the types of goods traded, namely jewelry, vegetable oils, copper, wood products, and fisheries. As a result, the motives behind the economic paradiplomacy of East Java are resource seeking, efficiency seeking, and market seeking of international actors. Nevertheless, the interdependence of East Java does not create balanced gains but only asymmetric interdependence and dependency of East Java especially on its economic relationship with China, causing a huge trade deficit estimated at around US$4 billion because of its dependency on foreign industrial machinery and technologies.

References

Aldecoa, F., & Keating, M. (2013). Paradiplomacy in action: the foreign relations of subnational governments. Routledge.

Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Harvard University Press.

Dunning, J. H. (2014). The globalization of business: The challenge of the 1990s. Routledge.

Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed.). Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00396337308441409

Kuznetsov, A. S. (2015). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. Routledge.

Mukti, T. A. (2020). Politics and sovereignty issues in Indonesia. The Phinisi Press.

Dermawan, R. (2019). The national interest in a globalised international system. Indonesian Journal of International Relations, 3(2), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.32787/ijir.v3i2.101

Fadhilah, A. N. (2024). Identifying East Java trade interest through paradiplomacy initiatives - Analysis on actors, processes and goals of diplomacy. Indonesian Journal of Social Development, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.47134/jsd.v1i4.2381

Kedhaton, K., & Adzmy, M. F. (2024). Paradiplomasi dalam isu kesetaraan gender: Kerja sama pemerintah Kabupaten Jember dan Rutgers WPF. Politica, 15(1).https://doi.org/ 10.22212/jp.v15i1.4358

Keohane, R. O. (1998). International institutions: Can interdependence work?. Foreign Policy, (110), 82–96.

Lecours, A. (2002). Paradiplomacy: Reflections on the foreign policy and international relations of regions. International Negotiation, 7(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1163/157180602401262456

Mayo, M. P. (2025). Absolute gains, relative losses: How the poor and the rich view redistribution differently. European Journal of Political Research, 64, 320–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12701

Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and relative gains in international relations theory. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303–1320. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1963947

Pujayanti, A. (2016). The role of regions in economic diplomacy. Politica: Jurnal Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional, 7(1).

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2024). Perkembangan ekspor impor Provinsi Jawa Timur, Desember 2024 (Berita Resmi Statistik No. 09/02/35/Th. XXIII). BPS Provinsi Jawa Timur.

Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2025). Perkembangan ekspor impor Provinsi Jawa Timur, Oktober 2025 (Berita Resmi Statistik No. 61/12/35/Th. XXIII). BPS Provinsi Jawa Timur.

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2024). Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban Gubernur Jawa Timur Akhir Tahun Anggaran 2024. Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur.

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur. (2025). Laporan Keterangan Pertanggungjawaban Gubernur Jawa Timur Akhir Tahun Anggaran 2025. Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur.

Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Tata Cara Kerja Sama Daerah dengan Pemerintah Daerah di Luar Negeri dan Kerja Sama Daerah dengan Lembaga di Luar Negeri.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Assegaff, F. T., & Redjosari, S. M. (2026). Navigating Asymmetric Interdependence: Actor Typology and Sectoral Preferences in East Java’s Economic Paradiplomacy (2024–2025). Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, 9(1), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.33822/mjihi.v9i1.14407