REDUCING PUBLIC SKEPTICISM THROUGH CSR COMMUNICATION

Authors

  • Uljanatunnisa Uljanatunnisa ID SCOPUS : 57209976144 Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Febriany Institut Agama Islam Nahdlatul Ulama
  • Della Bagusnur Hidayah Universiti Sains Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v6i3.6494

Keywords:

controversial industry, CSR communication, public skepticism

Abstract

This study aims to analyze Corporate Social Responsibility communication as an effort to reduce public skepticism towards PT HM Sampoerna, this is based on the pros and cons of the CSR program and CSR communication especially in controversial industries such as cigarette companies. Using four dimensions of CSR initiative messages, namely CSR Commitment, CSR impact, CSR Motive and CSR FIT with a qualitative content analysis method, the primary data of this study are posts on the official social media account @insidesampoerna during the data collection period from 1 January 2023 to 30 May 2023 Based on the results of the coding, the researcher found that most of the company's CSR communications used the message of the CSR Impact initiative which was represented by the description "the impact that has been felt by stakeholders. Furthermore, CSR motivation, CSR Commitment and CSR Fit can also be seen in the company's Instagram posts.

Author Biography

Uljanatunnisa Uljanatunnisa, ID SCOPUS : 57209976144 Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

Anggota Ikatan Sarjana Ilmu Komunikasi

Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

References

Arli, D., Rundle-Thiele, S., & Lasmono, H. (2015). Consumers’ evaluation toward tobacco companies: Implications for social marketing. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 33(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-01-2014-0015

Chitra Dinisari, M. (2020). Sampoerna Raih Penghargaan The Most Tax-Friendly Corporate. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20201216/79/1331746/sampoerna-raih-penghargaan-the-most-tax-friendly-corporate

De Jong, M. D. T., & Van Der Meer, M. (2017). How Does It Fit? Exploring the Congruence Between Organizations and Their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2782-2

Dedeoğlu, B. B., Taheri, B., Okumus, F., & Gannon, M. (2020). Understanding the importance that consumers attach to social media sharing (ISMS): Scale development and validation. Tourism Management, 76, 103954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.103954

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

Dunn, K., & Harness, D. (2019). Whose voice is heard? The influence of user-generated versus company-generated content on consumer scepticism towards CSR. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(9–10), 886–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1605401

Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003). When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1303_15

Ham, C.-D., & Kim, J. (2020). The effects of CSR communication in corporate crises: Examining the role of dispositional and situational CSR skepticism in context. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.05.013

Harizan, S. H., & Hamid, F. S. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility of Tobacco Companies: A Consumer Perspective. Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research (APIAR)

Hirschhorn, N. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: Hope or hype? Tobacco Control, 13(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2003.006676

Joireman, J., Liu, R. L., & Kareklas, I. (2018). Images paired with concrete claims improve skeptical consumers’ responses to advertising promoting a firm’s good deeds. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2015.1126757

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2016). From Homo Economicus to Homo dialogicus: Rethinking social media use in CSR communication. Public Relations Review, 42(1), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2015.11.003

Kompas, C. (2018). Sampoerna Raih 3 Penghargaan di Ajang CSR Global Award 2018. 2018. https://biz.kompas.com/read/2018/05/13/234632928/sampoerna-raih-3-penghargaan-di-ajang-csr-global-award-2018

Kurniawan, I. (2019). HM Sampoerna Raih Global CSR Awards 2019. https://www.neraca.co.id/article/115678/hm-sampoerna-raih-global-csr-awards-2019

Lee, T. H., & Comello, M. L. (Nori) G. (2019). Transparency and Industry Stigmatization in Strategic CSR Communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 33(1), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318918807566

Lee, Y.-J., O’Donnell, N. H., & Hust, S. J. T. (2019). Interaction Effects of System-Generated Information and Consumer Skepticism: An Evaluation of Issue Support Behavior in CSR Twitter Campaigns. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1507853

Lee, Y.-J., Yoon, H. J., & O’Donnell, N. H. (2018). The effects of information cues on perceived legitimacy of companies that promote corporate social responsibility initiatives on social networking sites. Journal of Business Research, 83, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.039

Lesmana, Sandi A., & Muflih, F. F. (2021). Gara-gara Seruan Larang Pajang Iklan Rokok, Anies Terancam Digugat ke Pengadilan. 2021. https://www.suara.com/news/2021/10/01/205750/gara-gara-seruan-larang-pajang-iklan-rokok-anies-terancam-digugat-ke-pengadilan

Lii, Y.-S., & Lee, M. (2012). Doing Right Leads to Doing Well: When the Type of CSR and Reputation Interact to Affect Consumer Evaluations of the Firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0948-0

Maulida, R. A., Uljanatunnisa, U., & Sevilla, V. (2021). Pengaruh Pemberitaan Tuduhan Eksploitasi Anak Terhadap Citra PT Djarum Indonesia. Ekspresi & Persepsi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi (4) 2. 213-223. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v4i2.2801

Moreno, F., & Kang, J. (2020). How to alleviate consumer skepticism concerning corporate responsibility: The role of content and delivery in CSR communications. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2477–2490. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1969

Purwanti, T. (2021). HM Sampoerna Raih The Best Community Impact. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20211130200145-17-295652/hm-sampoerna-raih-the-best-community-impact

Rim, H., & Kim, S. (2016). Dimensions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) skepticism and their impacts on public evaluations toward CSR. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(5–6), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1261702

Sheilanabila, S. A. (2021). Pro-Kontra: Display Rokok di Minimarket DKI Ditutup, Setuju Nggak? Detikhealth.Com. https://health.detik.com/berita-detikhealth/d-5723677/pro-kontra-display-rokok-di-minimarket-dki-ditutup-setuju-nggak

Skarmeas, D., & Leonidou, C. N. (2013). When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.004

Skarmeas, D., Leonidou, C. N., & Saridakis, C. (2014). Examining the role of CSR skepticism using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1796–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.010

Song, B., & Wen, J. (Taylor). (2020). Online corporate social responsibility communication strategies and stakeholder engagements: A comparison of controversial versus noncontroversial industries. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 881–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1852

Supriyatna, I. (2022). HM Sampoerna Raih BISRA Award 2022 untuk CSR dan Pengelolaan Bencana. 2022. https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2022/07/13/074750/hm-sampoerna-raih-bisra-award-2022-untuk-csr-dan-pengelolaan-bencana

Tandilittin, H., & Luetge, C. (2015). CSR activity of tobacco companies in Indonesia: Is it a genuine social responsibility? Online Journal of Health Ethics, 11. https://doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1101.03

Tölkes, C. (2018). Sustainability communication in tourism – A literature review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 27, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2018.04.002

van Rekom, J., Go, F. M., & Calter, D. M. (2014). Communicating a company’s positive impact on society—Can plausible explanations secure authenticity? Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.12.006

Velarosdella, N. R. (2021). Langkah Anies soal Kampanye Anti-rokok di Jakarta, Kirim Surat ke Bloomberg hingga Larang Pajang Bungkus Rokok. Kompas.Com. https://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2021/10/05/15135781/langkah-anies-soal-kampanye-anti-rokok-di-jakarta-kirim-surat-ke

Yasmine, S. M., & Swara, V. Y. (2022). Understanding the Practices of Strategic CSR in Controversial Industry: Case of Tobacco Company in Indonesia. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran Dan Dakwah Pembangunan, 6(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2022.061-04

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

Issue

Section

Artikel