Framing Analysis in Online Media detik.com and tempo.co Related to Hydrometeorological Disasters

Authors

  • Dzikrifa Ningtyas Aliifa Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Winda Eka Putri Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Ira Mirawati Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v8i1.10085

Keywords:

framing, hydrometeorological disaster, quantitative content analysis

Abstract

As a country with high disaster risk, Indonesia faces the occurrence of hydrometeorological disasters such as floods, landslides, and strong winds that dominate more than 90% of disasters every year. In this situation, the media has a role in conveying information to the public. This study provides an overview of how news framing related to hydrometeorological disasters in two Indonesian online media, namely detik.com and tempo.co. Using a quantitative content analysis method, this study analyzes how detik.com and tempo.co framed the news related to hydrometeorological disasters from January 1, 2022, to November 1, 2024, with explores five main news frames from Semetko and Valkenburg. In addition, this study explores the tone of the news towards the government and the actors who become news sources. The results of the 85 articles analyzed show that the attribution of responsibility frame is the most dominant frame in the coverage of hydrometeorological disasters, followed by the frames of human interest, economy, and morality. In contrast, the conflict frame is very minimal. On the other hand, this study also found that the media mostly made the government the primary source of news and was also dominated by a neutral tone towards the government. This research found specific trends in using news frames, tone, and news sources in reporting hydrometeorological disasters. This research offers a perspective on how the media constructs narratives around hydrometeorological disasters while raising critical questions about the role of the press in shaping public understanding of climate-related disasters in Indonesia.

References

Adiprasetio, J., & Larasati, A. W. (2021). Pandemic Crisis in Online Media: Quantitative Framing Analysis on detik.com’s Coverage of Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 24(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.56457

Adiprasetio, J., Rahmawan ,Detta, Wibowo ,Kunto Adi, Aliifa ,Dzikrifa Ningtyas, & Rudi Dwi, and H. (2024). Shrinking civic space and the media: How Indonesian media frame environmental issues. Journal of Civil Society, 20(3), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2024.2358924

Almahallawi, W., & Abdul Rahim, N. R. (2022). Framing of Covid-19 Pandemic News in Malaysian Local Newspapers. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(3), 244– 257. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2022-3803-15

Asprilla, A., & Maharani, N. (2019). Jurnalisme Data Dalam Digitalisasi Jurnalisme Investigasi Tempo. Kajian Jurnalisme, 02(02).

Aziz, M. H., Prasetyo, D., Putranto, T. D., & Arif, L. (2025). Local Mass Media and Multi- Stakeholders as Leading Sector in Disaster Communication at the Community Level. Ekspresi dan Persepsi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v8i1.9705

Bhalla, N. (2019). Who Is Responsible for Delhi Air Pollution? Indian Newspapers’ Framing of Causes and Solutions. International Journal of Communication, 12, 41–64.

BNPB. (2023). Data Bencana Indonesia Tahun 2023. Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. https://bpbd.kepriprov.go.id/files/buku-data-bencana-indonesia-tahun-2023.pdf

Brunken, B. L. (2006). Hurricane Katrina: A content analysis of media framing, attribute agenda setting, and tone of government response [Louisiana State University]. https://doi.org/10.31390/gradschool_theses.1502

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design. Pustaka Pelajar.

De Sola Pool, I., & Shulman, I. (1959). Newsmen’s Fantasies, Audiences, and Newswriting. Public

Opinion Quarterly, 23(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1086/266860

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x Eriyanto, & Mulyana, D. (2002). Analisis Framing: Konstruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media. LKiS.

Golan, G. J., & Himelboim, I. (2016). Can World System Theory predict news flow on twitter? The case of government-sponsored broadcasting. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1150–1170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106572

Hidayat, A. (2024, November 19). Krisis Iklim Bencana Hidrometeorologi. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/lingkungan/krisis-iklim-bencana-hidrometeorologi-1170420

Kim, J., & Wanta, W. (2018). News framing of the U.S. immigration debate during election years: Focus on generic frames. The Communication Review, 21(2), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2018.1479616

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd Edition). SAGE Publication.

Kurniawan, R. R. (2022). Analisis Framing Pemberitaan Ujaran Kebencian Abu Janda di Media Online detik.com. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.

Kuttschreuter, M., Gutteling, J. M., & De Hond, M. (2011). Framing and tone-of-voice of disaster media coverage: The aftermath of the Enschede fireworks disaster in the Netherlands.

Health, Risk & Society, 13(3), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2011.558620 Lahur, M. F. (2023, February 9). BNPB: Bencana Hidrometeorologi 4 Tahun, Kerugian Rp 31,5 Triliun. Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/lingkungan/bnpb-bencana-hidrometeorologi-

-tahun-kerugian-rp-31-5-triliun-220720

McQuali, D. (2010). Teori Komunikasi Massa McQuail. Salemba Humanika.

MIT Press Reader. (2019, May 30). The Importance of Being a Headline. The MIT Press Reader. https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/headlines-journalism/

Mutaqqin, A. (2023, July 12). Tulungagung Tingkatkan Kesiapsiagaan Hadapi Bencana Hidrometeorologi. Detik.Com. https://www.detik.com/jatim/berita/d-7076163/tulungagung-tingkatkan-kesiapsiagaan-hadapi-bencana-hidrometeorologi Odoemelam, C. E., Nik Hasan, N. N. N. H., & Hussein, A. (2021). The Effects of Framing on Oil Pollution as Covered by Print Media: A Case Study of Nigerian Newspapers. Revista Romana de Comunicare Şi Relaţii Publice, 23(1), 7–22.

Riffe, D., Lacy, S., Fico, F., Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. G. (2006). Analyzing Media Messages (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613424

Salwen, M. B. (1995). News on Hurricane Andrew: The agenda of sources and the sources’ agendas. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(4), 826–840.

Semetko, H. A., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News. Journal of Communication.

Statista. (2023). Media in Indonesia. Statista. https://www.statista.com/study/162157/media-in-indonesia/

Stawski, R., & Szews, P. (2024). Framing of the war in Ukraine: How the international press reacted to the outbreak of the conflict. Communications. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0102

Tempo. (2024). 50 Tahun Tempo: Selalu Menjadi Media Terdepan Mengkritik Kekuasaan.

Tempo.Co. https://www.tempo.co/internasional/50-tahun-tempo-selalu-menjadi-media- terdepan-mengkritik-kekuasaan-533562

Thier, K., & Wu, X. (2024). Framing Climate Solutions: An Exploratory Quantitative Content Analysis. Environmental Communication. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17524032.2024.2396978

Tierney, K. (2019). Disasters: A Sociological Approach. Polity Press.

West, R. L., & Turner, L. H. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application

(4th ed). McGraw-Hill.

WMO. (2024). State of the Global Climate 2023. https://wmo.int/publication-series/state-of-

global-climate-2023#

Downloads

Published

2025-01-31

Issue

Section

Articles