Archives

  • May-August (State Sovereignty, Membership, and Mobility: Comparative Perspectives on Immigration, Citizenship, and Electoral Law)
    Vol. 2 No. 2 (2026)

    This study compares legal systems governing land acquisition for public interest in Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and the United States. It examines the legal basis, procedural mechanisms, compensation systems, protection of land rights, and dispute resolution processes in each country. The study uses a normative comparative legal approach. It shows how different legal traditions shape state authority in acquiring land for development.

  • January-April (Constitutionalism and Emergency Powers: A Comparative Study of Legislative and Judicial Oversight in Indonesia and Other Countries)
    Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026)

    This study examines the legal systems governing land acquisition for public interest in Indonesia, Malaysia, China, and the United States. It analyzes the principles, procedures, compensation mechanisms, and legal protections provided to landowners in each country. The comparison aims to identify similarities, differences, and best practices that can contribute to the development of a fair, transparent, and effective land acquisition framework.

  • Justice in The Legal System
    Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025)

    This journal brings together scholarly articles that explore how different countries understand, structure, and apply the law. Using a comparative approach, it examines how legal traditions civil, common, religious, or customary reflect the histories, values, and cultures of their societies. More than rules and doctrines, the journal views law as a living system shaped by people, context, and the pursuit of justice. It is a space for dialogue among academics, practitioners, and readers who believe that appreciating legal diversity and its role in promoting fairness and equity can help build a more just and connected world.

  • Comprative Studies on Law Perspective

    Comparative Studies on Law Perspective
    Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)

    This journal brings together insightful articles that explore how different countries understand and apply the law. Through a comparative approach, it looks at how legal systems—civil, common, religious, or customary—reflect the values, histories, and cultures of their societies. Rather than just focusing on rules and doctrines, the journal invites readers to see law as a living system shaped by people and context. It’s a space for dialogue among scholars, practitioners, and curious minds who believe that understanding legal differences can help build a more just and connected world.