the The Roots of Corruption in Indonesia and Singapore: Building Real Anti-Corruption Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/jicls.v1i1.10826Keywords:
Corruption, Corruption Eradication, Indonesia, Tranparency, Law Enforcement, Surveillance System, Legal Culture, Reform, Case Study, Singapore, Zero ToleranceAbstract
Corruption in Indonesia is a serious problem that continues to hamper national development, undermine public trust in government, and cause huge losses to society. Although various regulations have been implemented, corrupt practices remain rampant in various sectors. This paper discusses the main causes of corruption in Indonesia, including weak oversight systems, low transparency, lack of individual integrity, permissive legal culture, and weak law enforcement. One of the root causes identified is excessive interest in material wealth, weak internal and external legal culture, and lack of transparency in financial management and public policy. The case study of the PT Pertamina Patra Niaga scandal shows gaps in the supervisory system and the ineffectiveness of regulations in preventing corruption. In comparison, Singapore's success in curbing corruption is referenced, with an emphasis on the principle of zero tolerance, the use of modern technology, monitoring of officials' assets, and public participation. From this analysis, several solutions are recommended for Indonesia, including strengthening the independence of law enforcement agencies, applying advanced technology in surveillance, increasing transparency, and providing decent salaries for public officials to reduce incentives for corruption. In conclusion, eradicating corruption requires a holistic approach that includes reforming the legal system, increasing public awareness, and strict supervision in all strategic sectors.
References
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Hamzah, A. (2019). Korupsi di Indonesia: Sebab, Akibat dan Solusi. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Rothstein, B., & Vargha, F. (2019). Good government: The relevance of political science. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Anwar, R. (2022). Intervensi Politik dan Penegakan Hukum Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Anti Korupsi, 8(2), 123–145.
Argiya, V. S. P. M. (2013). Mengupas tuntas budaya korupsi yang mengakar serta pembasmian mafia koruptor menuju indonesia bersih. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 2(2).
Darmawan, M. V., & Rahaditya, R. (2025). Penerapan delik permufakatan jahat dalam putusan perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(2), 729–736.
Farida, I. (2021). Dampak Korupsi terhadap Investasi Asing Langsung di Negara Berkembang. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 19(1), 56–78.
Hariwangsa, T., & Yuningsih, H. (2024). Upaya Penguatan Regulasi Untuk Mencegah Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Disiplin: Majalah Civitas Akademika Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda, 30(4), 121-130.
Juwita, D., & Yoserizal, Y. (2025). Faktor Penyebab Meningkatnya Angka Korupsi. Sanskara Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 3(01), 52-58.
Kambey, T. J. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Unsur Merugikan Perekonomian Negara Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 9(3). 207-217.
Kenneth, N. (2024). Maraknya kasus korupsi di Indonesia tahun ke tahun. JLEB: Journal of Law, Education and Business, 2(1), 335-340.
Khairunisa, R. M., Wardani, K. I., Sukirman, R. N. A., & Ulhaq, I. D. (2025). Penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dari perspektif teori Lawrence. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 2(2), 153–164.
Nurhasanah, N., & Hidayat, T. (2020). Pengawasan Internal dan Transparansi Anggaran sebagai Pencegahan Korupsi. Jurnal Akuntansi Pemerintah, 16(3), 234–256.
Mulyadi, A. (2025). Ada apa dengan Pertamina? Analisis hukum terhadap kasus korupsi PT. Pertamina Parta Niaga. BHAKTI: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 1(1), 37–48.
Odhy, F. (2021). Perspektif Budaya Hukum Dalam Perkembangan Kasus Korupsi di Indonesia. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 1(1), 30. 185-196.
Quah, J. S. T. (2021). Combating corruption in Singapore: What can be learned? Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 14(1), 77–92.
Ravallion, M. (2018). Corruption and poverty. The World Bank Economic Review, 32(1), 1–22.
Santiago, F. (2017). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Penegak Hukum untuk Terciptanya Ketertiban Hukum. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 1(1), 23-43.
Samuji, S. (2024). Aspek hukum pencucian uang dalam bentuk investasi di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 3(6), 8746–8757.
Seno, R. H. (2022). Kunci kesuksesan reformasi birokrasi Singapura: Pembelajaran untuk para pembuat kebijakan. Jurnal Litbang Provinsi Jawa Tengah, 20(2), 163–177.
Simbolon, N. Y. (2020). Politik hukum penanganan korupsi oleh Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi pasca disahkannya Undang-Undang No. 19 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Mercatoria, 13(2), 157–177.
Klitgaard, R. (2018). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.
Tempo. (2020). Laporan Investigasi: Kasus Korupsi di PT. Pertamina. Majalah Tempo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Ius Comparatum Law Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
