REFORMULASI HUKUM DAN PERBAIKAN ETIKA TERHADAP KEPOLISIAN ATAS PELANGGARAN PENGGUNAAN GAS AIR MATA STADION KANJURUHAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v2i1.9159Keywords:
kanjuruhan, Police, Crodw ControlAbstract
The police as a state tool that functions to maintain security, maintain order, protect and serve the community should be able to provide protection to the community. However, what is happening now is quite the opposite. As happened at the Kanjuruhan stadium where the police in controlling the crowd actually committed human rights violations. Human rights violations committed by the police show that at this time the police have not been able to position themselves proportionally. The purpose of this study was to determine the legitimacy of the use of tear gas in controlling the crowd at the Kanjuruhan Stadium by the police and to find out the legal reformulation and ethical improvement of the violation of mass control at the Kanjuruhan Stadium by the police. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach regarding the rules that should be the basis for mass control carried out by the police. Based on the results of the study, in terms of the validity of the actions taken by the police, it was stated that they did not take into account the level of threat or the safety of the community. Therefore, the way that can be done by the police in order to build a civilian character and improve their image is to carry out legal reformulation and ethical improvement over the violation of the Kanjuruhan Stadium crowd control by the police. The recommendations that the author gives to the PSSI institution, the match organizers, the police, the general public to the government so that this paradox does not happen again.
References
Atmoko, Ervan Yudhi Tri. “Tragedi Kanjuruhan Dan Pentingnya Mitigasi Bencana Dalam Pertandingan Sepak Bola.” Kompas.Com, 2022. https://www.kompas.com/sports/read/2022/10/03/18312718/tragedi-kanjuruhan-dan-pentingnya-mitigasi-bencana-dalam-pertandingan?page=all.
Dirgantara, Adhyasta, and Novianti Setuningsih. “Respons Polri Soal Temuan Kontras Terkait Mobilisasi Aparat Sebelum Tragedi Kanjuruhan.” Kompas.Com, 2022. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/10/09/21082401/respons-polri-soal-temuan-kontras-terkait-mobilisasi-aparat-sebelum-tragedi.
Friedman, Lawrence M. Hukum Amerika: Sebuah Pengantar, Terjemahan Dari American Law An Introduction. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2001.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, 1945.
Maharani, Tsarina, and Icha Rastika. “YLBHI: Ada 202 Kasus Pelanggaran HAM Kepolisian Sepanjang 2019-2021.” Kompas.Com, 2021. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/07/29/19101811/ylbhi-ada-202-kasus-pelanggaran-ham-kepolisian-sepanjang-2019-2021.
Martokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 1996.
Muhaimin, Muhammad. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram, 2020.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Membangun Polisi Sipil: Perspektif Hukum, Sosial, Dan Kemasyarakatan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2007.
Saputra, Eka Yudha. “8 Fakta Temuan Polri Dalam Tragedi Kanjuruhan Malang.” Tempo, 2022. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1642897/8-fakta-temuan-polri-dalam-tragedi-kanjuruhan-malang.
Sugiarto, Umar Said. Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.
Wirawan, Muhammad. “Di FIFA Stadium Safety and Security Regulations, Penggunaan Gas Air Mata Sudah Dilarang Tapi Kenapa Muncul Di Kanjuruhan Malang?” VOI ID. Jakarta, 2022. https://voi.id/olahraga/215129/di-fifa-stadium-safety-and-security-regulations-penggunaan-gas-air-mata-sudah-dilarang-tapi-kenapa-muncul-di-kanjuruhan-malan.
Peraturan Kepala Polisi Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2009 Tentang Penggunaan Kekuatan Dalam Tindakan Kepolisian, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
