MISKONSEPSI PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA JAMINAN FIDUSIA DALAM PRAKTIK LEASING OLEH BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN (BPSK)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v3i3.9006Keywords:
BPSK, Leasing Dispute;, Fiduciary GuaranteeAbstract
The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) in Indonesia has been a primary pillar in ensuring consumer protection since its establishment based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. Dispute resolution, particularly those related to fiduciary guarantees in leasing practices, has been a major focus in the realm of consumer law. The conflict of jurisdiction between BPSK and the District Court in resolving leasing disputes has led to misconceptions about the role and authority of BPSK in resolving leasing disputes. Based on this axiom, the author conducted this research to identify and analyze misconceptions present in leasing dispute practices in Indonesia. The research method employed was normative law with a legislative approach and case studies. The research findings affirm that although the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) has authority in resolving consumer disputes, it lacks jurisdiction in leasing dispute resolution, thus necessitating a more detailed approach to provide a comprehensive understanding of the role and authority of BPSK to ensure complete consumer protection.
References
Ahmad Wahidi dkk, Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Pengadilan Tuntutan Pengguna Malaysia (TTPM) Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, Vol. 23 No. 1, 2023.
Ahmadi Miru, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, (Jakarta:Rajawali Pers, 2007).
Andryawan,”Dualisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Sektor Jasa Keuangan”, Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2017.
Arif Rahman, Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Melalui Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Kota Serang, Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1, 2018.
C.S.T. Kansil, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1986).
Department for Business & Trade UK, Policy Paper: Strengthening Consumer Enforcement and Dispute Resolution: Policy Summary Briefing, Gov.UK, Dipublikasikan pada tanggal 21 Desember 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/digital-markets-competition-and-consumers-bill-supporting-documentation/strengthening-consumer-enforcement-and-dispute-resolution-policy-summary-briefing , diakses pada tanggal 13 Juni 2024
Direktorat Perlindungan Konsumen dan Tertib Niaga, “Lampiran Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Tertib Niaga Kementrian Perdagangan No. 162 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Strategis Direktorat Perlindungan Konsumen Dan Tertib Niaga 2020-2024” (2020), 14 dikutip dari Ahmad Wahidi, dkk, Kewenangan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Pengadilan Tuntutan Pengguna Malaysia (TTPM) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 23, Vo.1, Maret 2023.
Gunawan Wijdjaja dan Ahmad Yani, Jaminan Fidusia, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada), 2007.
Ignatius Ridwan Widyadharma, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia, (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Undip), 1999.
Junjung Sahala Tua Manik dkk, Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia : Mengamankan Aset Kreditur atau Melindungi Harta Debitur, Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, Vol. 9 No. 2, 2020.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia, “Permasalahan Hukum Fidusia Akibat Minimnya Pemahaman Masyarakat, diakses pada 10 Juni 2024 Pukul 11.38 WIB https://ntb.kemenkumham.go.id/berita-kanwil/berita-utama/6245-permasalahan-hukum-fidusia-akibat-minimnya-pemahaman-masyarakat
Skripsi Rahma Aditya, Gugatan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Pengadilan Negeri (Analisis Putusan No. 32/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PNTjb), Fakultas Hukum Universitas Driwijaya Indralaya 2018
Undang-Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan
Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen
Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Putusan MA No. 355 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2014
Putusan MA No. 472 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2014
Putusan MA No. 572 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2014
Putusan MA No. 25 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015
Putusan MA No. 341 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015
Putusan MA No. 481 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015
Putusan MA No. 549 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015
Putusan MA No. 770 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015
Putusan MA No.56 PK/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.64 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.188 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.189 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.311 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.350 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.352 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.397 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.506 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.592 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.593K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.594 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016,
Putusan MA No.620 K/Pdt.SusBPSK/2016
Putusan MA No.913 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Liwa Nomor 01/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2014/PN.LW
Misnar Syam dkk, Sengketa Leasing Dalam Konteks Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen, Unes Jurnal of Swara Justisia, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2023.
Muhamad Gakhairi Purnado, Suradi, Marjo, Kajian Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Bpsk Nomor 11/Ptsbpsk/Bkt/X/2015 Atas Upaya Hukum Keberatan Oleh Pihak Pelaku Usaha (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Bukittinggi Nomor 24/Pdt.Sus-Bpsk/2015/Pn.Bkt), Diponegoro Law Journal, Volume 6, No. 2 Tahun 2017.
Nanda Amalia, Hukum Perikatan, (Aceh: Unimal Press), 2013.
Nanda Amalia, Hukum Perikatan, (Lhokseumawe: Unimal Press, 2013).
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Penguatan Perlindungan Konsumen Dalam Penggunaan Jaminan Fidusia, Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa Keuangan, 2018.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Cet. 2, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2008).
Philipus M. Hadjon, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Administrasi Negara (Surabaya: Bina Ilmu,), 1987.
R. Soebekti, Jaminan-jaminan Untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia, (Bandung: Alumni), 1982.
Rahma Aditya, Gugatan Keberatan Terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Pengadilan Negeri (Analisis Putusan No. 32/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2016/PN.Tjb, Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya, 2018.
Rahmi Rimanda, Keberadaan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Quasi Yudisial Di Indonesia, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, Vol. 4 No. 1, 2019.
Rida Ista Sitepu dan Hana Muhamad, Efektifitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Sebagai Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Di Indonesia, Jurnal Rechten : Riset Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, Vol. 3 No. 2, 2021.
Sang Ayu Kadek Wiesma Dewintha dan Ni Putu Purwanti, Tanggung Jawab Penanggung Kepada Debitur Wanprestasi Dalam Hal Terjadi Kredit Macet, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 7 No. 5, 2019.
Sanusi, Kus Rizkianto, Imam Asmarudin, Perlindungan Hukum dalam Perjanjian Fidusia, (Jawa Tengah: Diya Media Group).
Selvi Septiyanti, Tinjauan Yuridis BPSK Dalam Pelindungan Konsumen Terhadap Produk Global, Jurnal Binamulia Hukum, Vol. 6 No. 2, 2017.
Shidarta, “Kewenangan BPSK Versus LAPS-OJK”, Binus University, Dipublikasikan pada Agustus tahun 2018, https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/08/18/kewenangan-bpsk-versus-laps-ojk/
State Consumer Rights Protection Authority, “About Authority”, Dipublikasikan pada tanggal 23 April 2024, https://vvtat.lrv.lt/en/about-authority/
Susanti Adi Nugroho, Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Ditinjau dari Hukum Acara Serta Kendala Implementasinya, (JakartaL Kencana Prenada Media Group), 2008.
Valtiolle.fi, “Consumer Disputes Board”, https://valtiolle.fi/en/employers/consumer-disputes-board/.
Yahman, Batas Pembeda Wanprestasi & Penipuan dalam Hubungan Kontraktual, (Surabaya: CV Jakad Media Publishing), 2019.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.
In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
