MENGKRITISI PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA MALPRAKTIK MEDIS: PARADIGMA CRITICAL VICTIMOLOGY

Authors

  • Ni Putu Tys Suindrayani Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i3.12247

Keywords:

critical victimology, malpractice, victim protection

Abstract

Abstract

This study aims to determine the ius constitutum for the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia, as well as to find out the critical victimology view in examining the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia.  This research is an empirical legal research by analyzing the results of interviews and reviewing them with a critical victimology approach.  The conclusion of this study is the ius constitutum for the protection of medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia still refers to the Witness and Victim Protection Law, the Medical Practice Law, the Health Law and the Criminal Code and the view that the imposition of criminal sanctions for medical malpractice perpetrators is considered a form of providing legal protection against  victims, and another form of fulfilling the rights of victims is to refer to the provision of compensation.  Therefore, there are imperfections in the application of victimology theory, especially the critical victimology approach in the provision and enforcement of legal protection for medical malpractice crimes victim in Indonesia.

 

Keywords: Critical Victimology; Malpractice; Victim Protection

References

Flora, Henny Saida. “KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN MALPRAKTIK MEDIS.” Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan 3, no. 01 (2018): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v3i01.1911.

Flora, Henny Saida. “Legal Protection on Victim of Medical Malpractice.” International Journal of Business, Economics and Law 13, no. 4 (2017): 1–8.

Irianto, Sulistyowati, and Sidharta. Metode Peneltian Hukum: Konstelasi Dan Refleksi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2009.

KBBI Daring, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/malapraktik

Kurniawan, Riza Alifianto. “RISIKO MEDIS DAN KELALAIAN TERHADAP DUGAAN MALPRAKTIK MEDIS DI INDONESIA.” PERSPEKTIF : Kajian Masalah Hukum Dan Pembangunan 18, no. 3 (September 2013): 148–56. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v18i3.26.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakana ke III. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2016.

Paripurna, Amira, Astutik, Prilian Cahyani, and Riza Alifianto Kurniawan. Viktimologi Dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Surabaya: Deepublish, 2021.

Supratman, and Philip. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan III. Jakarta: Alfabeta, 2015.

Sutarno. “STUDY ON VICTIMOLOGY OF MEDICAL MALPRACTICE IN INDONESIA.” International Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) 7, no. 10 (2019): 1153–59. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/9936.

Syamsu. Penjatuhan Pidana & Dua Prinsip Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2015.

Syaufi, Ahmad. Application of Restorative Justice Values in Settling Medical Malpractice Cases. Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 2021. https://repo-dosen.ulm.ac.id//handle/123456789/19338.

Wijaya, Dwi Fahri, Marwin Sitinjak, and Aston Martin Panggabean. “Penerapan Tindak Pidana Malpraktik Yang Menyebabkan Kematian Berdasarkan Uu No.36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.” Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) 3, no. 1 (August 2020): 147–52. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v3i1.219.

WMA - The World Medical Association-World Medical Association Statement on Medical Malpractice. n.d. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/world-medical-association-statement-on-medical-malpractice/.

Wolhuter, Lorraine, Nell Olley, and David Denham. Victimology Victimisation and Victims’ Rights. 1st Edition. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-15

How to Cite

Suindrayani, N. P. T. (2025). MENGKRITISI PERLINDUNGAN KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA MALPRAKTIK MEDIS: PARADIGMA CRITICAL VICTIMOLOGY. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 4(3), 217–227. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i3.12247

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Volume 4, Number 3, August 2025

Section

Artikel

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.