DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU KASUS TAMAN CAHAYA KOTA SURABAYA

Authors

  • Endik Hidayat
  • Efrem Suryatno Partama

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/jpds.v2i2.5899

Keywords:

Policy, Development, Public Space

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the impact of the green open space development policy in the city of Surabaya, especially in the Cahaya park, Babat Jerawat sub-district, Pakal district, Surabaya. This research use desciptive qualitative approach. Data collection techniques through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. Data analysis in this study starts from the process of collecting data, reducing data, displaying data and drawing conclusions. To find out the impact felt by the community around Pakal District with the construction of the Cahaya park, researchers used the policy impact dimensions proposed by Thomas R. Dye, there are two main findings. First, the Cahaya Park was built in the Babat Jerawat sub-district, Pakal sub-district, Surabaya, the purpose of the Cahaya park was to overcome the problems that exist in the community, especially the need for recreation areas, sports facilities, and children's playgrounds. Second, the park which was originally opened was the target of the policy as a place of recreation and as a biofilter against air conditions polluted by pollution, besides that there are groups outside the policy target, namely the community in Babat Jerawat Village, Pakal District, who also use the park for selling activities so that some people who used to be unemployed with the opening of the Cahaya park they can have a job as a merchant times five

References

Agustino, Leo. (2008), Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta

Ariesto H. Sutopo, Adrianus A. (2010), Terampil Mengolah Data Kualitatif. Jakarta Prenada

Media Group

Bungin, Burhan (2006). Sosiologi. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Dunn, William. (2003). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada

University Press.

Fandeli, C. (2004).Perhutanan Kota. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Gadjah

Mada

Hariyanti, Dini Try. 2008. Kajian Pola Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Publik Kawasan

Bundaran Simpang Lima Semarang. Semarang: Tesis Universitas Dipenogori

Hidayat, Kiki, Rosana, Rahma Kurnia Sri Utami. Analisis Ruang Terbuka Hijau di Kabupaten

Pringsewu Tahun 2014. Jurnal Penelitian Geografi. Vol. 4 No.1 Tahun 2016

Judistira K. Garna (1992), Teori-Teori Perubahan Sosial, Bandung 1992.

Moleong, Lexi J. (2007), Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Martono, Nanang. (2012). Sosiologi Perubahan Sosial Perspektif Klasik, Modern, Postmodern

dan Poskolonial. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Perkasa

Nazaruddin. 1994.Penghijaun Kota. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya

Pahrudin, HM. (2016). Dampak Alih Fungsi Lahan Pertanian Terhadap Pedagang Semanggi

di Kendung Benowo Surabaya Perspektif Teori Perubahan Sosial. Jurnal Kebijakan dan

Manajemen Publik GOVERNANCE Vol. 6 No. 1 April 2016

Ning, Purnomohadi. 2006. Ruang Terbuka Hijau: Sebagai Unsur Utama Tata Ruang Kota.

Jakarta: Kementrian PU

Rachmawati, Kiki. (2004). Kajian Kecenderungan Ruang Publik Simpang Lima Kota

Semarang Berkembang Sebagai Kawasan Rekreasi Belanja. Tugas Akhir Fakutas Tenik

Universitas Dipenogo Semarang.

Rosawatiningsih, Nila. (2018). Kebijakan Pengelolaan Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) Taman

Flora Surabaya. Jurnal Sosial dan Media Unesa Vol.3 No.1 Tahun 2018

Winarno, Budi. 2012. Kebijakan Publik (Teori ,Proses, dan Studi Kasus). Yogyakarta: Buku

Seru

Moenir. 2006. Manajemen Pelayanan Umum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Undang-Undang Penataan Ruang No 26 Tahun 2007

Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 7 tahun 2002 tentang pengelolaan ruang terbuka

hijau

Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 Penyelenggaraan Ketertiban Umum

dan Ketentraman Masyarakat

Downloads

Published

2021-07-31 — Updated on 2021-07-28

Versions

How to Cite

Hidayat , E. ., & Partama, E. S. (2021). DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN RUANG TERBUKA HIJAU KASUS TAMAN CAHAYA KOTA SURABAYA. PARAPOLITIKA: Journal of Politics and Democracy Studies, 2(2), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.33822/jpds.v2i2.5899 (Original work published July 31, 2021)