Audit Committee Characteristics and Financial Performance: Indonesian Evidence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v22i2.1326Keywords:
Financial Performance, Audit Committee CharacteristicsAbstract
This research investigates the effect of audit committee characteristics, which includes independence (ACIN), size (ACSIZE), competence (ACCO), and frequency of meetings (ACMT) on the financial performance (PERF) of manufacturing firms listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange for the year of 2016 and 2017. PERF is measured and proxy with the return on assets (ROA); ACIN is measured by the percentage of members from outside the company; ACCO is measured using percentage of audit committee members who have accounting and finance educational background; and ACMT is measured using the number of audit committee meetings in 2016 and 2017. The study finds that all of the characteristics of audit committee positively affect the company's performance. The research also uses three control variables, which are the quality of auditors (BIG4), financial leverage (LEV) and company size (SIZE). BIG4 and LEV positively affect the company's financial performance, while the financial performance of the company is negatively affected by SIZE.
References
Abbott, L. J., Parker, S., Peters, G. F., & Raghunandan, K. (2003). An Empirical Investigation of Audit Fees, Nonaudit Fees, and Audit Committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1506/8YP9-P27G-5NW5-DJKK
Abernathy, J. L., Beyer, B., Masli, A., & Stefaniak, C. (2014). The association between characteristics of audit committee accounting experts, audit committee chairs, and financial reporting timeliness. Advances in Accounting, 30(2), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2014.09.001
Afify, H. A. E. (2009). Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86. https://doi.org/10.1108/09675420910963397
Al-Mamun, A., Yasser, Q. R., Rahman, M. A., Wickramasinghe, A., & Nathan, T. M. (2014). Relationship between audit committee characteristics, external auditors and economic value added (EVA) of public listed firms in Malaysia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 12(1CONT9), 899–910. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv12i1c9p12
Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., Mcnamara, R., & Nagel, S. (2012). Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis. Accounting and Finance, 52(4), 971–1000. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2011.00447.x
AlMatrooshi, S. A. S., Al-Sartawi, A. M. A. M., & Sanad, Z. (2016). Do audit committee characteristics of Bahraini listed companies have an effect on the level of internet financial reporting? Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(3), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3p12
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 433–465. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(4), 441–454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2000.14.4.441
Bédard, J., & Gendron, Y. (2010). Strengthening the financial reporting system: Can audit committees deliver? International Journal of Auditing, 14(2), 174–210. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2009.00413.x
Bédard, Jean, Chtourou, S. M., & Courteau, L. (2004). The effect of audit committee expertise, independence, and activity on aggressive earnings management. Auditing, 23(2), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2004.23.2.13
Bouaine, W., & Hrichi, Y. (2019). Impact of Audit Committee Adoption and its Characteristics on Financial Performance: Evidence from 100 French Companies. Accounting and Finance Research, 8(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v8n1p92
Bucktowar, R., Kocak, A., & Padachi, K. (2015). Entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and networking: impact on innovation and firm performance. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946715500247
Chen, F., & Li, Y. (2013). Voluntary adoption of more stringent governance policy on audit committees: Theory and empirical evidence. Accounting Review, 88(6), 1939–1969. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50541
Contessotto, C., & Moroney, R. (2014). The association between audit committee effectiveness and audit risk. Accounting and Finance, 54(2), 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12010
De Vlaminck, N., & Sarens, G. (2013). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and financial statement quality: evidence from Belgium. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9282-5
DeZoort, F. T., Hermanson, D. R., Archambeault, D. S., & Reed, S. A. (2002). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21, 38–75. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/deborah-archambeault/17/
Dhaliwal, D. S., Naiker, V., & Navissi, F. (2010). The association between accruals quality and the characteristics of accounting experts and mix of expertise on audit committees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), 787–827. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01027.x
Dinu, V., & Nedelcu, M. (2015). The relationship between the audit committee and the financial performance, the asset quality and the solvency of banks in Romania. Transformations in Business and Economics, 14(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2702291
Eichenseher, J. W., & Shields, D. (1985). Corporate director liability and monitoring preferences. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 4(1), 13–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(85)90010-9
Felo, A. J., Krishnamurthy, S., & Solieri. (2003). Audit Committee Characteristics and the Perceived Quality of Financial Reporting: An Empirical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.401240
Guo, R.-J., & Yeh, Y.-H. (2014). The Composition and Effectiveness of Audit Committees in the Presence of Large Controlling Shareholders. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 26(3), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12085
Gurusamy, P. (2017). Board characteristics, audit committee and ownership structure influence on firm performance of manufacturing firms India. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 6(4), 73–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20170604.16
Herdjiono, I., & Sari, I. M. (2017). The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Performance of a Company. Some Empirical Findings from Indonesia. Journal of Management and Business Administration, 25(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.188
Ibrahim, A., & Ombaba, M. (2019). Audit Committee Independence and Financial Performance of Banking and Insurance Firms Listed in Nairobi Securities Exchange . Africa International Journal of Management Education and Governance, 4(March), 1–10.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Kalbers, L. P., & Fogarty, T. J. (1998). Organizational and Economic Explanations of Audit Committee Oversight. Journal of Managerial Issues, 10(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604189?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Kallamu, B. S., & Saat, S. A. . (2015). Audit committee attributes and firm performance: Evidence from Malaysian finance companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 23(3), 206–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-11-2013-0076
Krismiaji, Aryani, Y. A., & Suhardjanto, D. (2016). International Financial Reporting Standards, board governance, and accounting quality. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(4), 474–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-06-2014-0064
Lee, T., & Stone, M. (1997). Economic agency and audit committee: responsibilities and membership composition. International Journal of Auditing, 1(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1111/1099-1123.00016
Lloyd, B. (1991). The company chairman. Long Range Planning, 24(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(91)90107-y
McDaniel, L., Martin, R. D., & Maines, L. A. (2002). Evaluating Financial Reporting Quality: The Effects of Financial Expertise vs. Financial Literacy. The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement 2002), 139–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.139
McMullen, D. A. (1996). Audit committee performance: An investigation of the consequences associated with audit committees. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theor, 15(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/https://search.proquest.com/openview/5f1a821ba2bdd6de96d13e575faf62e8/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=31718
Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The Use of Audit Committees for Monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(94)90016-7
Mohammed, A. M. (2018). The impact of audit committee characteristics on firm performance: Evidence from Jordan. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(5), 32–42. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288267526
Oroud, Y. (2019). The Effect of Audit Committee Characteristics on the Profitability: Panel Data Evidence. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 11(4), 104–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v11n4p104
Pincus, K. M., & Wong, R. J. (1989). Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. Journal of Accounting & Public Polic, 8, 239–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(89)90
Pratheepkanth, P., Hettihewa, S., & Wright, C. S. (2016). Corporate governance and financial performance: The case of Australia and Sri Lanka. Global Review of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21102/graf.2016.03.71.01
Sharma, V., Naiker, V., & Lee, B. (2009). Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.3.245
Singhvi, M., Rama, D. V., & Barua, A. (2013). Market reactions to departures of audit committee directors. Accounting Horizons, 27(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50284
Stewart, J., & Munro, L. (2007). The impact of audit committee existence and audit committee meeting frequency on the external audit: perceptions of Australian auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 11(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2007.00356.x
Sultana, N., Singh, H., & Van der Zahn, J. L. W. M. (2015). Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Report Lag. International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12033
Velte, P. (2017). The link between audit committee, corporate governance quality and firm performance: a literature review. Corporate Ownership & Control, 14(4), 15–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i4art2
Vlaminck., & Sarens, G, N. (2015). The relationship between audit committee characteristics and financial statement quality: evidence from Belgium. Journal of Management Governance, 1(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-013-9282-5.
Wu, J., Habib, A., & Weil, S. (2012). Audit committee effectiveness: A synthesis of the audit committee literature. Corporate Board: Role, Duties and Composition, Vol. 8, pp. 15–31. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbv8i1art2
Yah, L. C. (2006). Economic theory and the East Asian region. Singapore Economic Review, 50(SPEC. ISS. 1), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217590805002177
Yang, J. S., & J., K. (2005). Audit committees and quarterly earnings Management. International Journal of Auditing, 9(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2005.00278.x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh Penulis sebagai berikut:Penulis menyimpan hak cipta dan memberikan jurnal hak penerbitan pertama naskah secara simultan dengan lisensi di bawah Creative Commons Attribution License yang mengizinkan orang lain untuk berbagi pekerjaan dengan sebuah pernyataan kepenulisan pekerjaan dan penerbitan awal di jurnal ini.
Penulis bisa memasukkan ke dalam penyusunan kontraktual tambahan terpisah untuk distribusi non ekslusif versi kaya terbitan jurnal (contoh: mempostingnya ke repositori institusional atau menerbitkannya dalam sebuah buku), dengan pengakuan penerbitan awalnya di jurnal ini.
Penulis diizinkan dan didorong untuk memposting karya mereka online (contoh: di repositori institusional atau di website mereka) sebelum dan selama proses penyerahan, karena dapat mengarahkan ke pertukaran produktif, seperti halnya sitiran yang lebih awal dan lebih hebat dari karya yang diterbitkan. (Lihat Efek Akses Terbuka).