Public Sentiment on Interfaith Marriage: (A Netnography Study of the Cretivox YouTube Video ‘Suami Kristen, Istri Islam’)

Authors

  • Anastasia Winanti Riesardhy University of Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v7i2.7288

Keywords:

controversy, communication, interfaith, marriage, netnography

Abstract

Indonesia's diversity creates opportunities for interfaith marriages. Although these marriages cannot be legally registered in Indonesia, their prevalence is increasing. This controversy stems from the belief that marriage is a private matter and shouldn't be regulated by the state. This study aims to describe public sentiment towards interfaith marriage through the Cretivox YouTube video "Suami Kristen, Istri Islam." In communication, interaction in social media, in this case commenting on YouTube videos, falls into the category of computer mediated communication (CMC). CMC theory is a type of integrable communication in which two or more people can only communicate or exchange information through a computer or referring to any kind of communication in which computer technology is used as a medium to connect individuals or groups of people to talk to each other. In research using CMC theory, Netnography is the most suitable approach where netnography is defined as a qualitative research methodology that adapts ethnographic research techniques to study the culture and community that occurs in CMC. This research found that public sentiment is generally positive, though some responses disagree. Some public argue against interfaith marriages, citing contradictions with Islamic values, while others oppose them as a precaution. Some comments shared their own interfaith marriage experiences, and some expressed hesitation or plans to enter such marriages.

References

Betlehn, A. (2022). Limitations on Interfaith Marriage Practices in Indonesia According to Human Rights Perspective. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 05(04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-17

Briones, R., Nan, X., Madden, K., & Waks, L. (2012). When Vaccines Go Viral: An Analysis of HPV Vaccine Coverage on YouTube. Health Communication, 27(5), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.610258

Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative Approaches to Comparing Communication Patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30(3–4), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.744249

CNN. (2018). Youtube Jadi Aplikasi Media Paling Populer di Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/teknologi/20180406202852-213-288967/youtubejadi-aplikasi-media-paling-populer-diindonesia

Erwinsyahbana, T. (2019). Aspek Hukum Perkawinan Antar Agama Dan Problematika Yuridisnya. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2018.v3.i1.p97-114

Fan, W., & Gordon, M. D. (2014). The Power of Social Media Analytics. Communications of the ACM, 57(6).

Jaspal, R., Turner, A., & Nerlich, B. (2014). Fracking on YouTube: Exploring Risks, Benefits and Human Values. Environmental Values, 23(5), 501–527. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X13947900181473

Katadata. (2019). Youtube Medsos No 1 di Indonesia. https://katadata.co.id/infografik/2019/03/0 6/youtube-medsos-no-1-di-indonesia

Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024

Kiousis, S. (2002). Interactivity: a concept explication. New Media & Society, 4(3), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/146144480200400303

Kozinets, R. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage Publication.

McMillan, S. J. (2002). Exploring Models of Interactivity from Multiple Research Traditions: Users, Documents, and Systems. In Handbook of New Media: Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs (pp. 163–182). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446206904.n13

Molyneux, L. (2018). Mobile News Consumption. Digital Journalism, 6(5), 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1334567

Nandapratiwi, Z. A., Nugraheni, A. S. C., & Maharani, A. E. P. (2022). A Juridical Analysis of Abroad Interfaith Marriage’s Position in Indonesia’s Law. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 1(10), 1242–1249. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v1i10.230

Nasir, M. A. (2022). Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law. Mazahib, 21(2), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.5436

Obadimu, A., Mead, E., Hussain, M. N., & Agarwal, N. (2019). Identifying Toxicity Within YouTube Video Comment (pp. 214–223). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21741-9_22

Nedumkallel, J. P. (2020). Interactivity of Digital Media. International Journal of Interactive Communication Systems and Technologies, 10(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICST.2020010102

Pratama, R. B. (2022). Nikah Beda Agama Ternyata Paling Banyak Terjadi di Surakarta, Kok Bisa?. https://kumparan.com/kumparannews/nikah-beda-agama-ternyata-paling-banyak-terjadi-di-surakarta-kok-bisa-1yryRUvdrtg/full

Puspita, R., & Suciati, T. N. (2020). Mobile Phone dan Media Sosial: Penggunaan dan Tantangannya pada Jurnalisme Online Indonesia. Ekspresi Dan Persepsi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v3i2.1781

Puspitasari, R. D. (2024). ‘Ribetnya’ Pernikahan Beda Agama, Bukti Negara Campuri Urusan Privat. Konde.Co. https://www.konde.co/2024/05/ribetnya-pernikahan-beda-agama-bukti-negara-campuri-urusan-privat/

Quiring, O., & Schweiger, W. (2008). Interactivity: A review of the concept and a framework for analysis. Comm, 33(2), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2008.009

Sanjaya, M. L. T., & Nasvian, M. F. (2024). Interaktivitas Netizen 24 Jam Pasca Deklarasi Bacapres AMIN. Ekspresi Dan Persepsi : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.33822/jep.v7i1.7169

Saputra, A. (2023). PN Jakut Izinkan Nikah Beda Agama Pasca-SEMA, Ini Sikap MA . Detik.Com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-6902148/pn-jakut-izinkan-nikah-beda-agama-pasca-sema-ini-sikap-ma

Thelwall, M. (2018). Social media analytics for YouTube comments: potential and limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1381821

Wen Li, W., Hodgetts, D., & Foo, K. H. (2018). Asia-Pacific Perspectives on Intercultural Psychology (W. W. Li, D. Hodgetts, & K. H. Foo, Eds.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158358

Yacob, R. (2019). Penggunaan Bahasa Pada Kolom Komentar Di Youtube: Studi Kajian Awal. Seminar Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(1).

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

Issue

Section

Artikel