PENGAWASAN DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN BADAN PENGELOLA INVESTASI DANANTARA DALAM PENGELOLAAN RISIKO KERUGIAN INVESTASI KEUANGAN NEGARA

Authors

  • Putri Ni'matul Maula Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Elsha Victoria Daniel Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Muhammad Hafizh Athallah Irawan Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Samuel Rainhard Lumban Gaol Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i2.10832

Keywords:

BPI Danantara, Transparency, Oversight, Investment, Accountability

Abstract

The Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency (BPI Danantara) was established to manage state investments and assets based on Government Regulation No. 10 of 2025 on the Organization and Governance of the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency, aiming to maximize government investment and encourage national economic growth. This research highlights the importance of transparency, oversight and accountability in managing the risk of state financial investment losses. BPI Danantara is required to prepare an annual performance report audited by an independent auditor and report periodically to the Supervisory Board, including agencies, such as KPK, BPK, and OJK. Despite the regulations, there are still concerns about the effectiveness of supervision and potential conflicts of interest within the Supervisory Board. Responsibility for investment losses falls entirely on BPI Danantara, not the state, leaving a gap in the moral accountability of investment managers. The purpose of this writing is to analyze the Supervisory Transparency Mechanism in the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency on the Implementation of State Financial Investments and the Legal Liability of the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency for the Risk of State Financial Investment Losses. This research uses a juridical-normative approach to analyze relevant regulations and emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability mechanisms in state financial management. It is expected that BPI Danantara can become a better model of financial management and contribute to national economic growth in accordance with further provisions in Government Regulation Number 10 of 2025 concerning Organization and Governance of the Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Agency.

References

Al Hikam, H. A (2025). Jika Danantara Boncos Tak Dihitung Sebagai Kerugian Negara. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2025. Finance.detik.com.https://finance.detik.com/berita-ekonomi-bisnis/d-7791700/jika-danantara-boncos-tak-dihitung-sebagai-kerugian-negara.

Gunawan, R. M. B. (2021). GRC (Good Governance, Risk Management, And Compliance)-Rajawali Pers. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Hakim, L. (2025). Ekonom Sebut Danantara Perkuat Transparansi Pengelolaan Aset Negara. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2025. Antaranews.com.https://m.antaranews.com/berita/4668285/ekonom-sebut-danantara-perkuat-transparansi-pengelolaan-aset-negara.

Hidayat, A. N. (2025). PP 10 Tahun 2025 Belum Memperkuat Instrumen Pengawasan BPI Danantara: Perlu Upaya Menjaga Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Lebih Baik Lagi. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2025. Strateginews.id.https://strateginews.id/2025/03/04/pp-10-tahun-2025-belum-memperkuat-instrumen-pengawasan-bpi-danantara-perlu-upaya-menjaga-transparansi-dan-akuntabilitas-lebih-baik-lagi/.

Hidranto, F. (2025). Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045 dengan BPI Danantara. Indonesia.go.id. Diakses pada tanggal 20 Maret 2025. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8751/menuju-indonesia-emas-2045-dengan-bpi-danantara?lang=1.

Imtinan, G., & Hasibuan, D. H. (2021). Pengaruh Temuan Audit Dan Tindak Lanjut Hasil Pemeriksaan Terhadap Tingkat Pengungkapan Laporan Keuangan Pada Kementerian. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 9(2), 215-224.

Koran BUMN. (2025). Perbedaan Lembaga Investasi Danantara dan INA. Koranbumn.com. Diakses pada tanggal 19 Maret 2025. https://koranbumn.com/perbedaan-lembaga-investasi-danantara-dan-ina/.

Kusuma, D. C. (2022). Analisis Lembaga Pengelola Investasi Sebagai Sovereign Wealth Fund Pasca Disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Pres.

Mulyadi, L. (2019). Teori Hukum Pembangunan Prof. Dr. Mochtar Kusumaatmadja, SH, LL. M: Sebuah Kajian Deskriftif Analitis. Jurnal Mahkamah Agung RI, 1-6.

Munawaroh, N. (2025). Hal Ihwal Danantara dan Pengawasannya. Hukumonline. com. Diakses pada tanggal 14 Maret 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/hal-ihwal-danantara-dan-pengawasannya-lt67bfef5b3c4ac/.

Nugroho, S. S., Haryani, A. T., dan Farkhani (2020). Metodologi Riset Hukum. Surakarta: Oase Pustaka.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 2025 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kelola Badan Pengelola Investasi Daya Anagata Nusantara. Lembar Negara 2025 (26), Tambahan Lembar Negara (7098), jdih.setneg.go.id.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2020 tentang Lembaga Pengelola Investasi. Lembar Negara 2020/No.286, Tambahan Lembar Negara No.6595, jdih.setneg.go.id.

Puspita, M. D. (2025). Beda Danantara Prabowo vs Indonesia Investment Authority Bentukan Jokowi. Tempo.co. Diakses pada tanggal 19 Maret 2025. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/beda-danantara-prabowo-vs-indonesia-investment-authority-bentukan-jokowi--1210466.

Putra, M. A., Lie, G., & Syailendra, M. R. (2023). LEGALISASI KEBIJAKAN SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND MELALUI LEMBAGA PENGELOLA INVESTASI DITINJAU DARI HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 10(3), 1396-1404.

Ramadhan, Parso, Iskandar, Dahliana, dan Nonni. (2024). Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Dalam Keuangan Publik. Medan: PT Media Penerbit Indonesia.

Romaliani, K. (2020). Check and balance dalam sistem pemerintahan Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Padangsidimpuan).

Saputra, D. (2025). Beda Tugas dan Fungsi Danantara Vs INA, Akankah Tumpang Tindih? Kabar24.bisnis.com. Diakses pada tanggal 19 Maret 2025. https://kabar24.bisnis.com/read/20250226/15/1842663/beda-tugas-dan-fungsi-danantara-vs-ina-akankah-tumpah-tindih.

Siagian, N. M. (2025). Mencegah Ke(tidak)bijakan Pengawasan Danantara. Hukumonline.com. Diakses pada tanggal 14 Maret 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mencegah-ketidakbijakan-pengawasan-danantara-lt67c0a61f7ca8b/.

Strategi News. (2025). PP 10 Tahun 2025 Belum Memperkuat Instrumen Pengawasan BPI Danantara: Perlu Upaya Menjaga Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Lebih Baik Lagi. Strateginews.id. Diakses pada tanggal 19 Maret 2025. https://strateginews.id/2025/03/04/pp-10-tahun-2025-belum-memperkuat-instrumen-pengawasan-bpi-danantara-perlu-upaya-menjaga-transparansi-dan-akuntabilitas-lebih-baik-lagi/.

Suryo, D. (2025). Danantara Dapat Diawasi KPK dan Diaudit BPK, Rosan: Tidak Ada yang Kebal Hukum. Kompas.tv. Diakses pada tanggal 15 Maret 2025. https://www.kompas.tv/nasional/576132/danantara-dapat-diawasi-kpk-dan-diaudit-bpk-rosan-tidak-ada-yang-kebal-hukum.

Susilo, N. (2025). Presiden Prabowo Janjikan Transparansi Pengelolaan BPI Danantara. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2025. Kompas.id.https://www.kompas.id/artikel/prabowo-janjikan-bpi-danantara-dikelola-transparan.

Sutedi, A. (2014). Aspek Hukum Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. RAS.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Lembar Negara 2025 (25), Tambahan Lembar Negara (7097), jdih.setneg.go.id.

Usle, U. (2025). Ambisi dan Risiko Danantara. Diakses pada tanggal 13 Maret 2025. Kabarbursa.com.https://kabarbursa.com/editorial/122761/ambisi-dan-risiko-danantara.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

Ni'matul Maula, P., Daniel, E. V., Irawan, M. H. A., & Lumban Gaol, S. R. (2025). PENGAWASAN DAN PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN BADAN PENGELOLA INVESTASI DANANTARA DALAM PENGELOLAAN RISIKO KERUGIAN INVESTASI KEUANGAN NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 4(2), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i2.10832

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 2, April 2025

Section

Artikel

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.