PENGUATAN KPPU MELALUI MODEL SUPERVISI UNTUK MENCEGAH TUMPANG TINDIH KEWENANGAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA

Authors

  • Farsya Dalila Alamsyah Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Muhammad Zayyaan Nasco Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Christian Immanuel Situmorang Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Muhammad Arkan Alfarel Kuswoyo Faculty of Law, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i2.10823

Keywords:

Business Competition, KPPU, Authority of institutions

Abstract

The establishment of state institutions aims to create a fair and effective legal order. However, over time the complexity of institutional authority often creates overlaps that need to be reviewed to avoid conflicts and clashes between institutions. The Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an example of an institution with authority that clashes with other institutions, such as the judiciary. KPPU has regulatory, administrative, and semi-judicial functions, which can cause overlaps between institutions. KPPU's authority is regulated in Law No. 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, which includes the authority to investigate, examine, and impose administrative sanctions on business actors who violate. The research method used is normative legal research, which examines library materials as well as the reactions and interactions that occur to analyze the application of the law according to applicable regulations without field research. The results of this study conclude: the emergence of urgency to reform the KPPU institution into a model supervision institution in order to create maximum performance and minimize overlapping authority with other institutions

References

antaranews.com, 2010. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/222973/todung-perlu-judicial-review-uu-anti-monopoli.

Eddyono, Luthfi Widagdo. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 7, no. 3 (2016): 01–48.

Fodhi, Azhari Sellomitha, Eky Lestari, Tyara Fridayanti Nuramalina, and Ghaida Raisya As-Syifa. “Pentingnya Pemisahan Kekuasaan Dalam Mempertahankan Pemerintahan Yang Seimbang.” JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 3, no. 3 (June 12, 2024): 26–37.

Hamdani, Hamdani, Mia Rasmiaty, and Ida Farida. “PENGANTAR HUKUM INDONESIA.” Penerbit Tahta Media (May 16, 2024). Accessed April 17, 2025. https://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/772.

Haq, Zul Amirul. “Urgensi tugas koordinasi dan supervise Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam pencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia.” bachelorThesis, Jakarta: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, 2018. Accessed April 17, 2025. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/43193.

Heriani, Fitri Novia. “MA Kuatkan 75 Persen Putusan KPPU,” 2024. Accessed March 14, 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ma-kuatkan-75-persen-putusan-kppu-lt66471a17caa60/?page=all.

Hukum Online. “KPPU, Superbody Tapi ‘Ringkih,’” 2010. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/kppu-isuperbodyi-tapi-ringkih-lt4cff7f5118590/?page=all.

KPPU. “Tugas & Wewenang,” n.d.

Mantili, Rai, Hazar Kusmayanti, and Anita Afriana. “Problematika Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dalam Rangka Menciptakan Kepastian Hukum.” Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no. 1 (2016): 116–132.

Margono, Suyud. Hukum Anti Monopoli. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.

Mulyadi, Dudung, and Ibnu Rusydi. “Efektivitas Peran Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) Dalam Penanganan Kasus Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat.” Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi 5, no. 1 (2017): 1–20.

Nurjaya, I. Ketut Karmi. “PERANAN KPPU DALAM MENEGAKKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN PRAKTEK MONOPOLI DAN PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 9, no. 1 (January 1, 2009): 83–90.

Paparang, Joshua Anggelito. “TUGAS DAN WEWENANG KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) DALAM PENANGANAN PELANGGARAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999.” LEX PRIVATUM 7, no. 7 (2019). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/28506.

Ramadhon, Arif Wahyu. “Kewenangan KPPU (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha) dalam tinjauan Undang-undang no 48 tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman dan maslahah mursalah.” Undergraduate, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2016. Accessed April 17, 2025. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/5323/.

Ruslina, Elli. “MAKNA PASAL 33 UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR 1945 DALAM PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM EKONOMI INDONESIA.” Jurnal Konstitusi 9, no. 1 (2016): 49–82.

Saolina, Maharani. “Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Secara Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia.” Journal of Law and Islamic Law 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2024): 83–94.

Sapitri, Baiq Ervinna. “KEWENANGAN KOMISI PENGAWAS PERSAINGAN USAHA (KPPU) DALAM PENANGANAN PERKARA PERSAINGAN USAHA (STUDI PERBANDINGAN DI INDONESIA DENGAN NEGARA-NEGARA COMMON LAW SYSTEM ).” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 3, no. 1 (April 20, 2015).

Saryana, Totok Tumangkar, Darmawan Tri Budi Utomo, Mieke Anggraeni, and Muni. “Penerapan Hukum Anti Monopoli Dalam Menjaga Persaingan Usaha Yang Sehat.” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 7, no. 11 (2024): 4090–4095.

Wijaya, Rangga. “Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Indonesian Journal Of Law Researc 1, no. 1 (2023): 23–27.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat, n.d.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-15

How to Cite

Alamsyah, F. D., Nasco, M. Z., Situmorang, C. I., & Kuswoyo, M. A. A. (2025). PENGUATAN KPPU MELALUI MODEL SUPERVISI UNTUK MENCEGAH TUMPANG TINDIH KEWENANGAN DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSAINGAN USAHA. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 4(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v4i2.10823

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Volume 4, Nomor 2, April 2025

Section

Artikel

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.