TANGGUNG JAWAB PENYEDIA KONTEN TIKTOK ATAS PENGUNGGAHAN FILM BAJAKAN MELALUI APLIKASI TIKTOK (STUDI KASUS : PELANGGARAN PEMILIK HAK CIPTA SINEMATOGRAFI)

Authors

  • Chindy Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v2i3.9100

Keywords:

Film Piracy, Copyright, Law Enforcement

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to examine the obligations of Tiktok content facilitators regarding uploading imitation films from the Tiktok platform and law enforcement efforts against cinematographic copyright errors related to uploading imitation films from the Tiktok platform by content owners. This article uses normative juridical legal research methods using statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this research prove that TikTok content owners must be responsible for preventing counterfeit films by acting directly to block user accounts. However, law enforcement regarding cinematography copyright violations has not been effective because there are still many content creators who upload imitation films to the TikTok application.

References

Abu, Yasid. “Aspek-Aspek Penelitian Hukum: Hukum Islam – Hukum Barat,” 15. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.

Agia Dwi Visi, Utami. “Aplikasi Tiktok Menjadi Media Hiburan Bagi Masyarakat Dan Memunculkan Dampak Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19.” MEDIALOG: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 4, 2021, 40–47.

Ari Turyandoko, Yohanes. “Penegakkan Hak Cipta Dari Tindakan Pembajakan Di Indonesia.” Lex Crimen II/ No. 5, no. 4 (2013): 113–21. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/3110/2654.

Arif Budiansyah. “TikTok Money Calculator, Cara Hitung Pendapatan Dari TikTok.” CNBC Indonesia, 2020. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20200302164518-37-141832/tiktok-money-calculator-cara-hitung-pendapatan-dari-tiktok.

Hasibuan. “Hak Cipta Di Indonesia Tinjauan Khusus Hak Cipta Lagu, Neighbouring Rights Dan Collecting Society,” 251–52. Bandung: Alumni, 2008.

Indonesia, Presiden Republik. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 28 tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta, Kementerian Sekretariat Negara RI § (2014).

Isnaini, Yusran. “Hak Cipta Dan Tantangannya Di Era Cyber Space,” 28. Bogor: Ghalia, 2009.

“Ketentuan Layanan,” 2022. https://www.tiktok.com/legal/terms-of-service-row?lang=id.

Mahmudji, Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,” 13. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. “Penelitian Hukum,” 3. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2010.

Mulyadi, M. “Riset Desain Dalam Metodologi Penelitian.” Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media 16 (2012).

Ningsih, Ayup Suran, and Balqis Hediyati Maharani. “Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta Terhadap Pembajakan Film Secara Daring.” Jurnal Meta Yuridis 2, no. pembajakan film (2019): 32.

Santoso, Budi. “HKI Hak Kekayaan Intelektual,” 98–100. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2011.

Sheila Mamentu, Mirza, Emma V T Senewe, and Jemmy Sondakh. “PEMBAJAKAN FILM DI SITUS INTERNET DALAM HUBUNGANNYA DENGAN HAK CIPTA 1 Oleh.” Lex Administratum IX, no. 1 (2021): 5–13.

Siambaton, Baru Tulus Obtain. “Modul Hukum Cyber & Transaksi Elektronik,” 196. Medan: Fakultas Hukum Universitas HKBP NOMMENCEN, 2018.

Supramono, Gatot. “Hak Cipta Dan Aspek – Aspek Hukumnya,” 1. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, 2012.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-15

How to Cite

Chindy. (2023). TANGGUNG JAWAB PENYEDIA KONTEN TIKTOK ATAS PENGUNGGAHAN FILM BAJAKAN MELALUI APLIKASI TIKTOK (STUDI KASUS : PELANGGARAN PEMILIK HAK CIPTA SINEMATOGRAFI). Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 2(3), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v2i3.9100

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Volume 2, Nomor 3, Agustus 2023

Section

Artikel

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Jurnal Statuta have CC-BY-SA or an equivalent license as the optimal license for the publication, distribution, use, and reuse of scholarly work.

In developing strategy and setting priorities, Jurnal Statuta recognize that free access is better than priced access, libre access is better than free access, and libre under CC-BY-SA or the equivalent is better than libre under more restrictive open licenses. We should achieve what we can when we can. We should not delay achieving free in order to achieve libre, and we should not stop with free when we can achieve libre.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Statuta licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.