Historical Pollution in the Polluter Pays Principle: Who Pays When the Polluter Is No Longer There?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v9i1.14795Keywords:
historical pollution, polluter pays principle, state responsibility, developing countryAbstract
The conventional Polluter Pays Principle encounters jurisdictional paralysis when confronted with historical pollution, particularly when responsible corporations escape liability through liquidation or strategic bankruptcy, leaving behind severely deteriorated environments as orphan sites. This normative legal research aims to formulate a policy reconstruction to bridge this intertemporal liability gap by analyzing successful environmental policy frameworks from various developing countries. Grounded in the protective function of state authority, governments possess an inherent responsibility and institutional capacity to proactively intervene in long-standing ecological crises. The analysis indicates that transferring remediation liability to the state can be effectively operationalized through adaptable instruments tested in the Global South, including state-led emergency restoration mechanisms, collective industry-funded environmental pools, and property-attached ecological obligations. In conclusion, the state must act as the primary executor of physical remediation upfront, subsequently utilizing its sovereign right to reclaim restoration costs from successor entities or parent companies to guarantee intergenerational ecological justice.
Downloads
References
Apergis, N., Gozgor, G., & Lau, C. K. (2021). Globalization and environmental problems in developing countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14105-z
Bosselmann, K. (2017). The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance (Second edi). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315553962
Bugge, H. C. (1996). The Principles of “Polluter Pays” in Economic and Law. In E. Eide & R. van der Bergh (Eds.), Law and Economics of the Environment (pp. 53–90).
Bugge, H. C. (2009). The polluter pays principle: Dilemmas of justice in national and international contexts. In Environmental Law and Justice in Context. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576027.022
Cilluffo, A. A., & Larson, L. N. (2025). The Hazardous Substance Superfund Trust Fund.
Crawford, J. (2002). The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect. American Journal of International Law. https://doi.org/10.2307/3070683
Feris, L. (2012). The Public Trust Doctrine and Liability for Historic Water Pollution in South Africa. Law, Environment and Development Journal, 8(1), 1.
Funabashi, H. (2006). Minamata disease and environmental governance. International Journal of Japanese Sociology, 15(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6781.2006.00082.x
Gatoto, P. (2025). A developing country’s perspective: Reforming insolvency laws to encourage their usage. International Insolvency Review, 34(3), 517–545. https://doi.org/10.1002/iir.70019
Gill, G. N. (2017). Environmental Justice in India: The National Green Tribunal. Routledge.
International Arbitration Tribunal. (1941). Trail Smelter Arbitration (U.S. v. Canada). In Reports of International Arbitral Awards.
Larson, R. B. (2014). Orphaned Pollution. Arizona State Law Journal, 45(4).
Luppi, B., Parisi, F., & Rajagopalan, S. (2012). The rise and fall of the polluter-pays principle in developing countries. International Review of Law and Economics, 32, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.10.002
Munir, M. (2013). History and Evolution of the Polluter Pays Principle: How an Economic Idea Became a Legal Principle? In SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2322485
National Green Tribunal. (2010). National Green Tribunal. https://www.greentribunal.gov.in/
Oliveira, L. V. P. D. L., & Costa, P. E. Q. da. (2025). Responsabilidade civil por desmatamento ilegal na Amazônia: análise da responsabilização objetiva e solidária. RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i2.2025.1674
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (1975). The Polluter Pays Principle: Definition, Analysis, Implementation.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1992). The Polluter-pays principle: OECD analyses and recommendations.
Percival, R. V, Cooper, K. H., & Gravens, M. M. (2012). CERCLA in a Global Context. Southwestern Law Review, 41(4), 727–772.
Pestana, M. H. D., & Formoso, M. L. L. (2003). Mercury contamination in Lavras do Sul, South Brazil: A legacy from past and recent gold mining. Science of the Total Environment, 307(1–3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(02)00535-1
Prokop, G., Schamann, M., & Edelgaard, I. (2000). Management of Contaminated Sites in Western Europe.
Ley No. 19.300 de Bases Generales del Medio Ambiente, (1994).
Rotolo, G. (2017). Historical pollution: In Search of a Legal Definition. In S. Manacorda & F. Centonze (Eds.), Historical Pollution: Comparative Legal Responses to Environmental Crimes. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56937-6_3
Shelton, D. (2006). Human Rights and the Environment: What Specific Environmental Rights Have Been Recognized? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 35(1), 129–171.
Simon, F., Gironás, J., Rivera, J., Vega, A., Arce, G., Molinos-Senante, M., Jorquera, H., Flamant, G., Bustamante, W., Greene, M., Vargas, I., Suárez, F., Pastén, P., & Cortés, S. (2023). Toward sustainability and resilience in Chilean cities: Lessons and recommendations for air, water, and soil issues. Heliyon, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18191
Singh, N. (2023). Climate Justice in the Global South: Understanding the Environmental Legacy of Colonialism. In Global Climate Justice: Theory and Practice.
Sohn, L. B., & Weiss, E. B. (1987). Intergenerational Equity in International Law. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 126–133.
Superior Tribunal de Justiça República Federativa do Brasil Súmula 613-STJ. (2018).
Supreme Court of India Decision M.C. Mehta vs Union of India 1988 AIR 1115. (1988).
Vozza, D. (2017). Historical pollution and long-term liability: A global challenge needing an international approach? In S. Manacorda & F. Centonze (Eds.), Historical Pollution: Comparative Legal Responses to Environmental Crimes. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56937-6_14
Weiss, E. B. (1989). In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Common Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. In Innovation in International Law. Brill Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.1990.9929015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Veteran Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The author(s) retain copyright and grant Veteran Law Review the right of first publication.
1. License
The use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
VELREV's spirit is to disseminate articles published as freely as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, VELREV permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work, including for commercial purposes, as long as they credit the author(s) and VELREV as the original publisher of the article.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Veteran Law Review).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. VELREV will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. VELREV will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that VELREV entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
VELREV will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article's editorial process is successfully completed. VELREV's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
