The Juridical Impications Of Withdrawal Life-Support In Hospital in Indonesia

Authors

  • Isniani Ramadhani PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL "VETERAN" JAKARTA UNIVERSITY
  • Sekar Prabarini Fakultas Kedokteran, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33533/jpm.v15i2.2372

Keywords:

Brain Stem Death, Hospital, Life Support, Euthanasia

Abstract

Withdrawal life-support is mainly categorized as part of euthanasia. When viewed from the aspect of criminal law in force in Indonesia, Indonesia does not permit active euthanasia by anyone (including doctors and medics). If the doctor ends the patient’s life by euthanasia is considered to violate criminal law. The study aimed to find out about life-support for patients with brainstem death in the hospital and to find out about the juridical implications of withdrawal life-support in cases of brain stem death. Based on the data discovered to be recorded, some conclusions that life support for brain stem death patients in the hospital is not needed because the element is futile. The juridical implications of withdrawal life-support in brain stem death patients in hospitals can be exempted from lawsuits if the doctor has implemented duties by medical ethics and acting in a medical professional manner, especially article 344 of The Criminal Code.

Author Biography

Isniani Ramadhani, PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL "VETERAN" JAKARTA UNIVERSITY

MEDICAL FACULTY

References

Sumner LW. Physician-Assisted Death: What Everyone Needs to Know. 1’st. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. 1–2 p.

Machmud S. Penegakan Hukum dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Dokter yang Diduga Melakukan Medikal Malpraktek. 1st ed. Bandung: Karya Putra Darwati; 2012. 391–402 p.

Liputan6.com T. Suami korban malpraktik minta istrinya disuntik mati. Liputan6.com [Internet]. 2004; Available from: https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/86272/suami-korban-imalpraktiki-minta-istrinya-disuntik-mati.

Sigi T. Malpraktek dan Euthanasi. Liputan6.com [Internet]. 2004; Available from: https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/87142/imalpraktik-dan-eutanasia.

Winarno H. Eutanasia di Indonesia, Ketika suntik mati jadi pilihan. merdeka.com [Internet]. 2016; Available from: https://www.merdeka.com/khas/ketika-suntik-mati-jadi-pilihan-eutanasia-di-indonesia.html.

Solahuddin. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Acara Pidana dan Perdata [Internet]. 1st ed. Jakarta: Transmedia Pustaka; 2008. 150 p. Available from: https://bpsdm.kemendagri.go.id/Assets/Uploads/laporan/8766a8aa21d7469c338306d12eeb320b.pdf.

Isnawan F. Kajian Filosofis Pro dan Kontra Dilarangnya Euthanasia. Mahkamah. 2016;2:337.

Gedge E, Giacomini M, Cook D. Withholding and withdrawing life support in critical care settings: ethical issues concerning consent. J Med Ethics [Internet]. 2007 Apr 1;33(4):215–8. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2652778.

Redi A. Hukum pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2018. 104 p.

RI KK. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2014. Indonesia; 2014.

Richmond DE. Are Withdrawal of Therapeutic Support and Administering Lethal Substances Ethically Equivalent ? 2012;1–4. Available from: https://euthanasiadebate.org.nz/ethical-difference.

Triwibowo C. Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. 1st ed. Jogjakarta: Nuha Medika; 2014. 16 p.

Notoatmodjo S. Etika dan Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta; 2010.

Nasser M. Sengketa medis dalam pelayanan kesehatan. Jogjakarta: FK UGM; 2011. p. 6.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-21

How to Cite

Ramadhani, I., & Prabarini, S. (2021). The Juridical Impications Of Withdrawal Life-Support In Hospital in Indonesia. Jurnal Profesi Medika : Jurnal Kedokteran Dan Kesehatan, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.33533/jpm.v15i2.2372