Analisis Struktur Jaringan Sosial sebagai Indikator Polarisasi dan Fragmentasi Politik Digital: Telaah Kasus [CONSOLIDATED] Singapore General Election 2025 Thread di Forum HardwareZone

Authors

  • Parlin FVB Berek Vyco Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
  • Putrawan Yuliandri Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Keywords:

Polarisasi Struktural , Analisis Jaringan Sosial, Pemilihan Umum Singapura 2025, HardwareZone, SNA

Abstract

This study analyzes the evolution of structural polarization within digital discussion networks surrounding the 2025 Singapore General Election (SGE) on the HardwareZone forum, integrating the framework of Interian et al. (2023) with the temporal approach of Alamsyah et al. (2021). Employing a longitudinal descriptive-quantitative design, the research uses Social Network Analysis (SNA) to trace changes in the structure of social interactions across five electoral phases: pre-election, parliamentary dissolution, campaign period, polling day, and post-election. The unit of analysis is the interactional ties among forum users, based on 17,263 valid relations extracted from 33,571 posts, collected via web scraping using Python (BeautifulSoup) and processed with NetworkX. Four metrics are used to measure polarization: Modularity (Q), Homophily (H), the E–I Index, and Betweenness Centrality (BC). The results show that polarization intensifies during the campaign phase (Q: 0.47→0.62; H: 0.58→0.71; E–I: –0.23→–0.46) and declines in the post-election period as high-BC bridging actors emerge to restore network connectivity. The findings underscore that digital polarization is dynamic, fluctuating with electoral momentum, and demonstrate the effectiveness of integrating Python–NetworkX-based SNA with temporal analysis in the study of online political polarization.

References

Alamsyah, A., Rahardjo, B., & Kuspriyanto. (2021). Social Network Analysis Taxonomy Based on Graph Representation.

Currarini, S., Matheson, J., & Vega-Redondo, F. (2016). A simple model of homophily in social networks. European Economic Review, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.03.011

Economist Intelligence Unit (2006-2024) – processed by Our World in Data. (2025, June 27). Democracy Index. https://archive.ourworldindata.org/20250627-150110/grapher/democracy-index-eiu.html

Freedom House. (2025). Freedom in the World. https://freedomhouse.org/country/singapore/freedom-world/2025

Habibi, M. N., & Sunjana. (2019). Analysis of Indonesia Politics Polarization before 2019 President Election Using Sentiment Analysis and Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2019.11.04

Interian, R., G. Marzo, R., Mendoza, I., & Ribeiro, C. C. (2023). Network polarization, filter bubbles, and echo chambers: an annotated review of measures and reduction methods. International Transactions in Operational Research, 30(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13224

ISET Policy Institute. (2025, April 30). Media (de)Polarization Index. https://iset-pi.ge/en/indexes/14-media-depolarization-index/3579-april-2025-media-depolarization-index

Khoo, S. Z. T., Ho, L. H., Lee, E. H., Goh, D. K. B., Zhang, Z., Ng, S. H., Qi, H., & Shim, K. J. (2020). Social Media Analytics: A Case Study of Singapore General Election 2020. Proceedings - 2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2020. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData50022.2020.9378358

Morning Consultant. (2025, June 18). Global Political Polarization Rankings. https://pro.morningconsult.com/trackers/global-political-polarization-rankings

Newman, M. E. J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(23), 8577–8582. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601602103

Nord, Marina, David Altman, Fabio Angiolillo, Tiago Fernandes, Ana Good God, & Staffan I. Lindberg. (2025). DEMOCRACY REPORT 2025 25 Years of Autocratization – Democracy Trumped?

Pang, N., & Goh, D. (2016). Can blogs function as rhetorical publics in Asian democracies? An analysis using the case of Singapore. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.001

Pew Research Center. (2019, December 17). In a Politically Polarized Era, Sharp Divides in Both Partisan Coalitions. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/12/17/in-a-politically-polarized-era-sharp-divides-in-both-partisan-coalitions/

Reyes, V. C. (2013). An Exploratory Case Study of Contesting Political ?Space? in Singapore. St Antony’s International Review, 8(2), 33–46. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26228737

RSF. (2025). Singapore. https://rsf.org/en/country/singapore

Soon, C., & Cho, H. (2011). Flows of relations and communication among Singapore political bloggers and organizations: The networked public sphere approach. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2010.514538

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.

USC Annenberg. (2021, November 3). USC Polarization Index reveals America’s political divide remains wide. https://annenberg.usc.edu/news/research-and-impact/usc-polarization-index-reveals-americas-political-divide-remains-wide

V-Dem (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. (2025). Civil society participation indexV-Dem. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/civil-society-participation-index

Zhang, W. (2016). Social media and elections in Singapore: comparing 2011 and 2015. Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2016.1231129

Published

2025-11-16