LLM-Driven Identification of Digital Financial Inclusion Gaps in Developing Economies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59664/jded.v5i2.14131Keywords:
digital financial inclusion; Global Findex; digital paymentsAbstract
This study identifies the developing economies that face the largest digital-finance activation bottlenecks after basic account access has already been achieved. Using the 2024 country layer of Global Findex 2025 and merging it with World Development Indicators on internet use and mobile subscriptions, the paper constructs an activation-gap measure that captures the distance between account ownership and high-frequency digital payment use. The analytical sample contains 86 developing economies after restricting the data to national all-adult observations and to countries with complete target variables. The average country in the sample had account ownership of 58.68% but a high-frequency payment index of only 21.64%, leaving a mean activation gap of 37.04 percentage points. The empirical strategy estimated repeated five-fold cross-validated Ridge, Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM models for both regression and high-gap classification. XGBoost produced the strongest regression fit, with an RMSE of 5.32 percentage points and an R² of 0.794, and it also delivered the best classifier, with an AUC of 0.863. The largest observed gaps were recorded in Ghana (64.91 percentage points), Uganda (64.61), and Zambia (60.88). SHAP-based interpretation shows that account ownership, internet use, mobile money account penetration, card-linked government payment channels, and digital skills were the most influential predictors. The results establish that the central policy challenge in many developing economies is no longer account opening alone; it is the conversion of nominal access into repeated digital payment behavior. The final diagnostic layer converts measured model outputs into country-specific policy notes, creating a reproducible bridge from predictive analytics to practical public policy design.
Keywords : digital financial inclusion; Global Findex; digital payments
References
Aker, J. C., & Mbiti, I. M. (2010). Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 207-232.
Allen, F., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., & Martinez Peria, M. S. (2016). The foundations of financial inclusion: Understanding ownership and use of formal accounts. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 27, 1-30.
Aron, J. (2018). Mobile money and the economy: A review of the evidence. The World Bank Research Observer, 33(2), 135-188.
Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2007). Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 27-49.
Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5-32.
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794). ACM.
Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., Ansar, S., & Hess, J. (2018). The Global Findex Database 2017: Measuring financial inclusion and the fintech revolution. World Bank.
Demirguc-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2022). The Global Findex Database 2021: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank.
Donou-Adonsou, F., & Sylwester, K. (2016). ICT, financial development, and poverty reduction: Evidence from developing countries. Telecommunications Policy, 40(11), 1045-1053.
Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232.
GSMA. (2023). State of the industry report on mobile money 2023. GSMA.
GSMA. (2024). State of the industry report on mobile money 2024. GSMA.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction (2nd ed.). Springer.
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2021). An introduction to statistical learning: With applications in R (2nd ed.). Springer.
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2014). Risk sharing and transactions costs: Evidence from Kenya's mobile money revolution. American Economic Review, 104(1), 183-223.
Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T.-Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 3146-3154).
Klapper, L., El-Zoghbi, M., & Hess, J. (2016). Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: The role of financial inclusion. CGAP.
Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (pp. 4765-4774).
Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340.
Philippon, T. (2016). The fintech opportunity. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 22476.
Sahay, R., von Allmen, U. E., Lahreche, A., Khera, P., Ogawa, S., Bazarbash, M., & Beaton, K. (2020). The promise of fintech: Financial inclusion in the post COVID-19 era. International Monetary Fund.
Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288-1292.
World Bank. (2014). Global financial development report 2014: Financial inclusion. World Bank.
World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank.
World Bank. (2021). World development report 2021: Data for better lives. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qi Xin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
