The Integration of Alternative Dispute Resolutions Institutions in the Financial Services Sector with POJK No. 61/POJK.07/2020
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v5i2.4633Keywords:
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Dispute Settlement, Financial Sector, Integration Principle, Unification PrincipleAbstract
Financial institutions and consumers/customers have more than a contractual relationship. Financial institutions and consumers build trusting relationships. These 2 financial services businesses are used for financial services dispute resolution. The settlement includes Banking, Insurance, Capital Market, Guarantee, Pension Fund, and Financing and Pawnshops. In 2020, OJK issued POJK No. 61/POJK.07/2020 on Alternative Institutions for Financial Services Sector Disputes. The newest Financial Services Authority Regulation divides dispute resolution into 6 financial services sectors. This time, it's 1 alternative dispute resolution institution for financial services. This study examines the unification principle's applicability. Integration of conflict resolution organizations, authorities, and methods in the financial services industry. Legal normative research is used. This study uses primary and secondary legal sources from laws and books/journals. This study shows that alternative dispute resolution entities in the financial services sector have implemented unification and integration to conflict resolution.Downloads
References
Books:
Nur Dewata, Mukti Fajar;, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris. Cetakan ke. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2017.
Journals:
Afif Khalid, “Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia.” Al ’Adl , Vol 6, No 11, (2014).
Aufa, Muhammad Fikri, “Asas Unifikasi Dan Integrasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan”, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, (2022).
Aufa, Muhammad Fikri, Wempy Setyabudi Hernowo, and Dewi Nurul Musjtari, “Dynamics of Sharia Cooperative Regulation in Indonesia”, Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, Vol 6, No 2, (2021): 224–35.
Clifford, Damian, and Yung Shin Van Der Sype, “Online Dispute Resolution: Settling Data Protection Disputes in a Digital World of Customers”, Computer Law and Security Review, Vol 32 NO 2, (2016): 272–85.
Hernowo, Wempy Setiabudi, and Muhammad Fikri Aufa. “Dewan Pengawas Syariah Koperasi Syariah Dalam Bias Pengaturannya.” Pandecta Research Law Journal, Vol 16, No 2, (2021): 368–79.
Keuangan, Otoritas Jasa, “Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.” Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, (2020).
Kirby, Nikolas, “An ‘institution-First’ Conception of Public Integrity.” British Journal of Political Science, Vol 51, No 4, (2021): 1620–35.
Kurbanov, Rashad, “Regional Integration and Law: An Approach to Issues of Theory and Practice”, Selected Topics in Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol 7 1, No 4, (2021): 41–54.
Lestari, Hesty D, “Otoritas Jasa Keuangan: Sistem Baru Dalam Pengaturan Dan Pengawasan Sektor Jasa Keuangan”, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol 12, No 3 (2012): 12–18.
Lestari, R, “Perbandingan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Mediasi Di Pengadilan Dan Di Luar Pengadilan Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Riau, Vol 3, No 2, (2013): 9080.
Marbun, Robinsar, “Juridical Analysis Of Employee Considerations As Administrative Competition Agency”, Veteran Law Review, Vol 3, No 1, (2020): 21–32.
Maulana, Ade, and Devi Siti Hamzah Marpuang, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Melalui Mekanisme Arbitrase”, Rechtsregel, Vol 4, No 1, (2021): 1–9.
Meers, Jed, and Liz Hind, “The ‘code Adjudicator’ Model: The Pubs Code, Statutory Arbitration and the Tied Lease”, Legal Studies, Vol 3594412, (2021): 1–19.
Miswardi, Miswardi, “Kajian Ekonomis Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui ADR (Alternative Despute Resolution)”, EKONOMIKA SYARIAH : Journal of Economic Studies, Vol 4, No 1, (2020): 74.
Musjtari, Dewi Nurul, Ani Yunita, and Muhammad Khaeruddin Hamsin, “Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Melalui Mekanisme Fasilitasi Oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (Ojk)”, Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol 49, No 1, (2020): 1.
Muskibah, Lili Naili Hidayah, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Melalui Arbitrase Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”, Pandecta Research Law Journal, Vol 16, No 1, (2021): 14–26.
Rusydi, Bustanul Arifien, “Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa”, Universitas Islam Indonesia, (2015).
Tauhiddah, Titia, Busyra Azheri, and Yussy Mannas, “Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Lembaga Pembiayaan Antara Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (Bpsk) Dengan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (Laps))” DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 5, No 1, (2020): 94–105.
Tjoneng, Arman, Christin S. Basani, and Vira Sintia, “Implementation Law Issues Of Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 Of 2019 About Perma Revision No. 2 Of 2015 About Small Calim Court Resolution Procedures And Its Settlement Efforts”, Veteran Law Review, Vol 3, No 2, (2020): 21–32.
Wingate, Emmanuel Onyedi, and Pontian N. Okoli, “Judicial Intervention in Arbitration: Unresolved Jurisdictional Issues Concerning Arbitrator Appointments in Nigeria”, Journal of African Law, Vol 65, No 2 (2021): 223–43.
Website Material:
Semarang, Sonora, “Alternative Institutions for Resolving Financial Services Sector Disputes”, Youtube Channel Sonora Semarang, (2021).
Shara, Nida, “Enam Lembaga Sengketa Jasa Keuangan Terintegrasi Pada 2021.” investor.id, 2020. https://investor.id/finance/enam-lembaga-sengketa-jasa-keuangan-terintegrasi-pada-2021.
SJK, LAPS, “Interview with Bapak Tri Legono Yanuarachmadi as Secretary of the Institution for Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Financial Services Sector in South Jakarta October 22, 2021”, (2021).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Veteran Law Review Journal
Veteran Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
VELREV's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. VELREV permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and VELREV to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Veteran Law Review).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. VELREV will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. VELREV will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that VELREV entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
VELREV will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JOSI's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
