Country Independence Of State-Owned Enterprises: Relationship Between Private Law And Public Law

Authors

  • Yoyo Arifardhani Faculty of Law, Pancasila University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v1i1.395

Abstract

BUMN is a business entity that all or part of its capital is owned by the state through direct participation from separated state assets. Based on its duties and responsibilities, BUMN has an important role in helping the government carry out the tasks of national economic development. This independence and professionalism are interpreted as free political interference in the operations of state-owned enterprises that can prevent BUMN from carrying out its duties and functions. The realization of the professionalism of this BUMN is challenged by two aspects, namely at the level of law and economic politics. The legal position of BUMN today is inseparable from the concept of state finances. The concept of state losses can be found in the State Finance Law and in more detail regulated in the State Treasury Law. Article 35 of the State Finance Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adriyani, W. (2009). Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Pengelolaan Persero. Disertasi, Fakultas Hukum Airlangga.

Algra, N. E. et.al. (1977). PengantarIlmuHukum, Jakarta: BinaCipta.

Apeldoorn, V. (1985). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Vols. 34). Jakarta: PT Pradnya Paramita.

Barber, N. W. (1996). Professor Loughlin’s Idea of Public Law. (Vols. 25). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, No. 1, 2005, p. 165. Bruggink, JJ. H., Refleksi Tentang Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Cheffins, B. R. (2012). The History of Corporate Governance, ECGI Working Paper Series in Law.

Clark, R. C. (1986). Corporate Law, Aspen Law & Business, p. 141. Donaldson, Thomas. Corporations and Morality. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. : Prentice Hall.

Hadiyanto. (2012). Politik Hukum Pengelolaan Kekayaan BUMN Persero dalam Rangka Pembangunan Perekonomian Indonesia“. Disertasi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjadjaran.

Hadianto, M. (1994). PerandanPosisi BUMN Dalam Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Kedua, ed. Moh. Arsjad Anwar dkk. StrategiPembiayaandan Regrouping BUMN: Upaya Menciptakan Sinergi Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Daya Saing BUMN. Jakarta.

Hansmann, H., & Kraakman, R. (2004). What is Corporate Law?. Center for Law, Economics and Public Policy Yale Law School, Research Paper No. 300,.

Hasan, D. Pengelolaan Kekayaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dan Permasalahannya, Kompilasai Hukum Bisnis, dalam rangka Purnabakti Prof. Dr. H. Man Sastrawidjaja, S.H., S.U., Bandung: CV. Keni Media.

Mertokusumo, S. (2003). Mengenal Hukum: Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Monks, R. A. G., & Minow, N. (1990). Corporate Governanc. Blackwell Business,(Vols. 2). Black, H. C., M.A. Black’s Law Dictionary. West Publishing, (Vols. 6), Centennial Edition.

Pramono, N. (2006). “Kekayaan Negara Yang Dipisahkan Menurut UU No. 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang BUMN, dalam Sri Rejeki Hartono, et.al, ed, Permasalahan Seputar Hukum Bisnis: Persembahan kepada Sang Maha Guru, Jogjakarta.

Prasetya, R. (1995). Kedudukan Mandiri PT Disertai Dengan Ulasan Menurut UU No.1 Tahun 1995 Tentang PT. Bandung: PT.Citra Aditya Bakti.

Prasetya, R., & Hamilton, N. (1976). The Regulation of Indonesian State Entreprises, Law and Public Enterprise in Asia, International Legal Center, p. 147, New York: Praeger Publishers.

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian MKRI. (2005). Teori Mengenai Anggaran Negara. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral MK-RI.

Rajagukguk, E . (2007). Dalam Seminar, Peran BUMN dalam Mempercepat Pertumbuhan Perekonomian Nasional. Jakarta.

Tjandra, W. R. (2006). Hukum Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.

Rido, A. (2004). Badan Hukum dan Kedudukan Badan Hukum, Perseroan, Perkumpulan, Koperasi, Yayasan, Wakaf. Bandung: PT.Alumni.

Ritonga, A. (2012). Perspektif Pengelolaan Kekayaan BUMN Persero Dihubungkan dengan Sistem Keuangan Negara Dalam Pembangunan Perekonomian Mencapai Negara Kesejahteraan, Unpad: Dalam Disertasi.

Safitri, I. (2004). Upaya Hukum Yang Dapat Ditempuh Oleh Pemegang Saham, dalam Emmy Yuhassarie et.al., Prosiding rangkaian Lokakarya Terbatas Masalah-masalah Kepailitan dan Wawasan Hukum Bisnis Lainnya Tahun 2004:PT dan Good Corporate Governane. Jakarta: Pusat Pengkajian Hukum.

Sastrawidjaja, M. S., & Mantili. (2008). PT menurut Tiga Undang-Undang. (Vol. 1). Bandung: PT. Alumni.

SoeriaAtmadja, A. P. (2005). Keuangan Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum: Teori, Kritik dan Praktik. Jakarta: Badan Penerbitan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia.

Sulaiman, A. (2011). Keuangan Negara pada Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dalam Perspektif Ilmu Hukum, Alumni.

Sulistio. (2006). dalam Seminar, Fatwa Mahkamah Agung dan Pengungkapan Korupsi Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Jakarta.

Supramono, G. (1996). Hukum PT yang baru. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Tumbuan, F. B. G. (1975). “Tugas dan Wewenang Organ PT Menurut UUPT”, Sosialisasi Undang-Undang Tentang PT”, Jakarta, 2007, p. 6. Friedmann, Lawerence M, American Law,The Legal System, A social Science Perspective, New York : Russel Sage Foundation.

Tjandra, R. W. BUMN “Cap Sapi Perah” Politisi, 3 Desember 2012. http://gagasanhukum.wordpress.com/2012/12/03/bumn-cap-sapi-perah-politisi/

------------,. (2006). Pengertian Keuangan Negara dan Kerugian Negara, Nyanyian Sunyi Kemerdekaan Menuju Indonesia Negara Hukum Demokratis, Jakarta, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, Lembaga Studi Hukum dan Ekonomi.

---------------,. (2006). Hukum Keuangan Negara. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

------------,. Peranan Hukum Dalam Mendorong BUMN Meningkatkan Pendapatan Negara Dan Kesejateraan Rakyat, Disampaikan pada pertemuan “Peranan BUMN Dalam Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Negara”, Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Departemen Hukum dan HAM R.I., Jakarta 28 Juli 2008.

------------,. (2009). Keuangan Publik Dalam Perspektif Hukum: Teori, Kritik dan Praktek. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

----------- ,.(2012). Perseroan Terbatas menurut Tiga Undang-Undang. (Vol. 1). Jilid 2. Salendro Timur, Bandung: CV. Keni Media.

------------,. (2017). Permasalahan Seputar Hukum Bisnis, “Persembahan Kepada Sang Maha Guru”, Kekayaan Negara Yang Dipisahkan Menurut UU. No. 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang BUMN. (Vol. 1). Jakarta: Gitama Jaya.

Downloads

How to Cite

Arifardhani, Y. (2018). Country Independence Of State-Owned Enterprises: Relationship Between Private Law And Public Law. Veteran Law Review, 1(1), 50–71. https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v1i1.395

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Article

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Veteran Law Review Journal

Veteran Law Review is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 Creative Commons License

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

VELREV's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the  Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. VELREV permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and VELREV to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. 

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Reproduce the work
  • Prepare derivative works based upon the work
  • Distribute copies of the work
  • Perform the work publicly
  • Display the work publicly
  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Veteran Law Review).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. VELREV will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. VELREV will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that VELREV entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees. 

7. Miscellaneous

VELREV will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JOSI's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.