REFORMASI PEMIDANAAN KORUPSI KORPORASI MELALUI KONSTRUKSI MODEL DEFFERED PROSECUTION AGREEMENT BERBASIS KEADILAN SOSIAL DI INDONESIA

Rafi Pravidjayanto; Neha Hifa Haq; Muhammad Aqil Alfatoni

doi:10.35586/jyur.v12i1.10751

Authors

Rafi Pravidjayanto UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Neha Hifa Haq UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Muhammad Aqil Alfatoni Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v12i1.10751

Keywords:

Deferred Prosecution Agreement, Korupsi Korporasi, Keadilan Sosial

Abstract

Corruption is the main factor in doing business in Indonesia. The subject of corporate law plays a major role in the rate of economic growth in Indonesia, thus causing a tendency for corruption crimes by corporations. Enforcement through penal channels imposed on corporations reaps problems, such as a decline in public trust which results in a decrease in corporate income which has implications for mass termination of employment. The purpose of this paper is to examine the opportunities and challenges of implementing the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) or suspension of prosecution in the enforcement of corporate crimes carried out with a non-penal approach based on John Rawls' social justice. This study uses a juridical-normative method with conceptual, legislative, and comparative approaches. The results of the paper show that the importance of the implementation of the DPA and its potential application lies in the prosecutor as the ruler of the case by applying the principle of opportunity. The challenges in its implementation are related to the differences in the state legal system that uses the DPA mechanism, the shift in the principle of enforcing corruption crimes as extra ordinary crimes from primum remedium to ultimum remedium. The recommendations offered include the urgency to establish a special law that regulates the DPA mechanism in Indonesia as a consequence of the civil law legal system, adding a mechanism if the corporation has good faith in submitting an agreement with the prosecutor through Self-Report and opportunities to improve corporate governance.

References

Agustine, O.V., 2019. Ruu Perampasan Aset Sebagai Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia. Huk. Pidana dan Pembang. Huk. 1, 2–3.

Amrani, H., 2021a. Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, 1st ed. UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Amrani, H., 2021b. Hukum Pidana Ekonomi, 1st ed. UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Arlen, J., 2016. Prosecuting beyond the rule of law: Corporate mandates imposed through deferred prosecution agreements. J. Leg. Anal. 8, 192.

Atmasasmita, R., 2010. Perbandingan hukum pidana. Bandar Maju, Bandung.

Eka Saputra, D., 2023. Legal Review of Justice Collaborator in The Concept of Criminal Law. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Educ. Commun. Econ. 2, 174.

Faiz, P.M., 2009. Teori Keadilan Jhon Rawls. J. Konstitusi 6, 140.

Fatahillah Akbar, M., 2021. Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi DalPam Berbagai Putusan Pengadilan. J. Huk. Pembang. 51, 807.

Ferdian, A., 2021. Konsep Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Dpa) Dalam Pertanggung-Jawaban Pidana Korporasi Sebagai Bentuk Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Arena Huk. 14, 529.

Ginting, A.B., Nelson, F.M., Santoso, T., Ms, S.H., Indonesia, U., 2017. The Idea of Preventing Corporate Corruption Through Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) in Indonesia. In: 3rd International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences. pp. 1159–1165.

Greenberg, T.S., Samuel, L.M., 2009. Stolen Asset Recovery : A Good Practices Guide for Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture. The World Bank, Washington DC.

Hafid, I., 2021. Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Economic Analysis Of Law. J. Lex Renaiss. 6, 470.

Hiariej, E.O.S., 2017. Prinsip Prinsip Hukum Pidana, 1st ed. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta.

Iqbal, A., 2020. Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement Di Indonesia Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Korporasi. J. Yuridis 7, 217.

Justice, U.. D. of, 2019. Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Statues. United State.

Kurniawaty, Y., 2017. Efektivitas Alternatif Penyelesaian SengketaDalam Sengketa Kekayaan Intektual ( Alternative Dispute Resolution On Intellectual Property Dispute ). J. Legis. Indones. 14, 163–170.

Marzuki, P.M., 2005. Penelitian Hukum, Revisi. ed. Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta.

Mulyadi, M., 2011. Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Perspektif Criminal Policy (Corruption Reduction in Criminal Policy Perspective). J. Legis. Indones. 8, 218.

Paramitha, S., 2019. Pengawasan Kejaksaan Terhadap Terpidana yang Menjalani Pidana Bersyarat (Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Mataram). Universitas Mataran.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi, n.d.

Pound, R., 1922. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law, 1st ed. Oxford University Press, London.

Priatko, A.L., 2018. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Saham Terhadap Terjadinya Kerugian Yang Diakibatkan Pelanggaran Hukum Oleh Emiten Dalam Kegiatan Pasar Modal (Studi Kasus Pt Nusa Konstruksi Enjiniring Tbk. Univ. Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang. Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang.

Putri, N.K., Simenlu, A., Aniqa, F., Mulitalia, I.T., Adisma, M.F., 2024. Disharmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Antara Bentuk, Penyebab Dan Solusi. Wathan J. Ilmu Sos. dan Hum. 1, 56.

Rahardjo, S., 2006. Ilmu Hukum, 6th ed. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Ramelan, 2012. Laporan Akhir Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Perampasan Aset Tindak Pidana. Jakarta.

Raveli, R., 2018. The international rise of deferred prosecution agreements - and how to obtain one. Lexology 1–3.

Ravena, D., 2007. Mencandra Hukum Progresif dan Peran Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Syiar Huk. J. Ilmu Huk. 9, 190–201.

Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

Santiawan, I.M., 2021. Konsep Deferred Prosecution Agreement (Dpa) Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. J. Kertha Semaya 9(6), 1044–1045.

Schedule 17 Crimes and Courts Act 2013 - Deferred Prosecution Agreement, n.d.

Schwab, K., 2019. The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018, World Economic Forum. Geneva.

Sianturi, P.R., 2020. Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Sebagai Primum Remedium Dalam Upaya Pengembalian Aset Negara Pada Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Simbur Cahaya 27, 19–42.

Sinaga, M.R., 2021. Konsep Deffered Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Di Indonesia. Lega Lata J. Ilmu Huk. 6, 80–97.

Siregar, P.J.W.S., 2022. Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law dan Common Law dalam Penerapan Yurisprudensi Ditinjau dari Politik Hukum. J. Progr. Magister Huk. Fak. Huk. Univ. Indones. 2, 1027–1036.

Soekanto, S., 1986. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. CV. Rajawali, Jakarta.

Sofian, A., 2022. Mengenal Kejahatan Korporasi. Bussines Law Press, Jakarta.

Subroto, T., . H., , S., 2017. Pengawasan Terhadap Aparatur Lembaga Kejaksaan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. J. Huk. dan Pembang. Ekon. 5, 131–142.

Sudarto, Hartiwningsih, H.P., 2018. Mekanisme Perampasan Aset Dengan Menggunakan Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. J. Huk. dan Pembang. Ekon. 5, 109–118.

Suhariyanto, B., 2016. Restoratif Justice Dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi Demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Negara. J. Rechsvinding 5, 422.

Sulistiyono, A., 2018. Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia Dalam Teori dan Praktik. Prenada Media , Jakarta.

Supriyanta, S., 2007. Ruang Lingkup Kejahatan Ekonomi. J. Ekon. dan Kewirausahaan 7, 42.

Susanti, D.S., Sarah, N., Hilimi, N., 2018. Korporasi Indonesia Melawan Korupsi : Strategi Pencegahan. Integritas:Jurnal Antikorupsi 4, 209.

Taniady, Vicko, D., 2023. Penerapan Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Di Indonesia. J. Magister Huk. Udayana 12.

Tusan, P.S.A., 2015. Kewenangan Komisi Kejaksaan Terhadap Tugasnya Untuk Melakukan Pengawasan Khususya Kepada Kewenangan Penuntut Umum. J. Magister Huk. Udayana 4, 651.

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, 1999. . Indonesia.

Wilson Ang, Jeremy Lua, Paul Sumilas, 2018. Deferred Prosecution Agreements – Justice delayed or Justice denied? Bus. Ethics Anti-Corruption Asia Pacific Insights 03.

Zenno, M.P., 2017. Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. J. Yudisial 10, 257.