Legal Liability for Artificial Intelligence Decisions in the Indonesian Judicial System

Authors

  • Rizki Dwi Saputra Universitas Terbuka

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Legal Liability, Judicial System, Accountability, Indonesia

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into judicial processes has created new challenges for Indonesia’s legal system, particularly in defining accountability and legal liability for AI-assisted decisions. This study aims to analyze how AI technologies can be harmonized with Indonesia’s legal framework while upholding judicial independence, transparency, and fairness. Using a normative legal research method, the study examines statutory provisions, doctrinal principles, and comparative practices from the European Union and the United States. The analysis reveals that current Indonesian lawssuch as Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power and Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions do not yet regulate liability for AI-generated outcomes. Consequently, AI cannot be recognized as a legal subject, and responsibility remains with developers, operators, or judicial institutions. The study concludes that Indonesia must establish a specific legal framework defining human oversight, AI accountability, and ethical governance to ensure that technological innovation aligns with constitutional principles of justice and human rights. These findings contribute to the development of a transparent and responsible AI governance model within Indonesia’s judiciary.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarie, B., Niblett, A., & Yoon, A. (2016). Regulation by machine. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2878950

Azzahra, M. A. (2024). Judicial reform through the use of information and communication technology to realize the principles of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. Journal Evidence of Law. https://jurnal.erapublikasi.id/index.php/JEL/article/view/947

Casey, A. J., & Niblett, A. (2017). The death of rules and standards. Indiana Law Journal, 92(4). https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=11261&context=ilj

Dewi, N. P. (2024). Penegakan hukum terhadap peran artificial intelligence di Indonesia. AnalogI Hukum: E-Journal Warmadewa. https://ejournal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/analogihukum/article/view/11551

European Commission. (2020). White paper on artificial intelligence: A European approach to excellence and trust. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence_en

European Parliament & Council. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 — Artificial Intelligence Act. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj

Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation.” AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

Hallevy, G. (2010). The criminal liability of artificial intelligence entities—From science fiction to legal social control. Akron Intellectual Property Journal, 4(2), 171–201. https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronintellectualproperty/vol4/iss2/1

Haryanto, R. (2024). Sistem peradilan pidana berbasis kecerdasan buatan (AI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Hukum. https://prosiding.appihi.or.id/index.php/PROSEMNASHUK/article/view/19

Hildebrandt, M. (2018). Algorithmic regulation and the rule of law. Philosophy & Technology, 31(2), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0261-5

Huang, Y., & Russell, A. (2024). Hybrid deep learning for legal text analysis: Predicting punishment durations in Indonesian court rulings [Preprint]. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20104

Indonesia National Strategy on Artificial Intelligence (Stranas KA). (2020). National strategy for artificial intelligence 2020–2045. Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN). https://s899a9742c3d83292.jimcontent.com/download/version/1610650061/module/8284006463/name/AISCI-2020-Indonesia.pdf

Kusuma, D. (2025). Potensi pemanfaatan teknologi artificial intelligence sebagai produk lembaga peradilan pidana di Indonesia. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/380309009_Potensi_Pemanfaatan_Teknologi_Artificial_Intelligence_Sebagai_Produk_Lembaga_Peradilan_Pidana_di_Indonesia

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE). (n.d.). Consolidated English text. https://www.icnl.org/wp-content/uploads/Indonesia_elec.pdf

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. (n.d.). Official text. https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_2009_48.pdf

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 1 Tahun 2019 tentang Administrasi Perkara dan Persidangan di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Perma e-Court). (2019). Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. https://ecourt.mahkamahagung.go.id/PERMA_01_2019.pdf

Rahman, I. (2023). Analisis etika dan legalitas penggunaan artificial intelligence. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai. https://jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/25455

Raharja, M. D. D. D., Sadnyini, I. A., & Angelo, M. (2024). Copyright regulation for AI-generated images: Legal approaches in Indonesia and the United States. SASI: Jurnal Hukum, 30(4), 355–368. https://fhukum.unpatti.ac.id/jurnal/sasi/article/view/2228

UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380455

Wisnubroto, T. (2025). Preventing AI crime towards a new legal paradigm: Lessons from United States. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.53955/jhcls.v5i2.606

Judijanto, L., & Harsya, R. M. K. (2025). Etika dan hukum dalam penggunaan artificial intelligence terhadap privasi digital di Indonesia. Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 3(03), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v3i03.543

Downloads

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

Rizki Dwi Saputra. (2025). Legal Liability for Artificial Intelligence Decisions in the Indonesian Judicial System. Veteran Law Review, 8(2), 182–192. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upnvj.ac.id/Velrev/article/view/12549