Electronic Evidence in Proving the Mens Rea Element in Corruption Crimes: A Case Study of Abuse of Authority
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35586/velrev.v9i1.11175Keywords:
Electronic evidence; Mens Rea; Corruption; Abuse of AuthorityAbstract
The development of information technology has given rise to new forms of electronic evidence that are crucial in the enforcement of criminal law. In the context of corruption, various cases show that digital evidence such as emails, instant messages, recorded conversations, or banking transactions often becomes the key to uncovering the modus operandi and criminal patterns. This study aims to examine the position of electronic evidence in the evidentiary system of corruption crimes in Indonesia and evaluate its role in proving the mens rea (criminal intent) element in corruption cases involving abuse of authority. The research method used is normative legal research with a literature review approach. The results indicate that electronic evidence is normatively recognized as valid within the evidentiary system in Indonesia and plays a significant role in proving mens rea in cases of abuse of authority. Digital information helps strengthen allegations of intent by showing plans or hidden motives in corruption acts. Therefore, clear regulations and improved capacity of law enforcement officials are essential so that electronic evidence can be optimally utilized without disregarding the principles of a fair trial.
Downloads
References
Ar, A. M., & Rusbandi, A. S. (2024). Peran Niat (Mens rea) dalam Pertanggungjawaban Pidana di Indonesia. 1(3), 240–252.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2014). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Prenadamedia Group.
Ekasakti, U. (2025). Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi ( Kajian Kasus Tersangka Tom Lembong ). 8(4), 846–852.
Hamzah, A. (2022). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Haris Budiman, E. all. (2021). Sosialisasi Undang Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan Untuk Mencegah Meluasnya Bank Emok Pada Masyarakat Tidak Mampu. Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 04(02), 126–132.
Hukum, F., Nahdlatul, U., & Mataram, W. (2015). Pembuktian terbalik dalam pemeriksaan tindak pidana korupsi di indonesia. 93–107.
Karisa, I. A. (2020). ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN OLEH ANAK (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Klaten Nomor: 35/Pid.Sus.Anak/2014.PN.Kln). Verstek, 8(1), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v8i1.39623
Lalu Samsu Rizan. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan dan Kepastian Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Pro Hukum, 11(5), 410–425.
Pahlevi, R. R., Zaini, Z. D., & Hapsari, R. A. (2021). Analisis Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Onrechtmatigedaad) Terhadap Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 5(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v5i1.2826
Pribadi, I. (2018). Legalitas Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3(1), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss1.art4
R. Soesilo. (1996). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Politeia.
Rahmatullah. (2021). Penegakan Hukum Dalam Kasus Korupsi Ditengah Pandemi Covid-19 Dan Kaitannya Dengan HAM. Ganesha Civic Education Journal, 3(1), 19–27.
Setiawan, R., & Arista, M. O. (2018). Efektivitas undang-undang informasi dan transaksi elektronik di indonesia dalam aspek hukum pidana. Recidive, 2(2), 139–146. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/recidive/article/viewFile/32324/21500#:~:text=Di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor,pengguna dan penyelenggara Teknologi Informasi.
Susanti Ante. (2013). Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana. Lex Crimen, II(2), 98–104.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektonik (UU ITE) yang diperbaharui Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Veteran Law Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Veteran Law Review Journal
Veteran Law Review © 2022 by Faculty of Law Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author, and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
VELREV's spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. VELREV permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and VELREV to distributing works in the journal and other media of publications.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
- Reproduce the work
- Prepare derivative works based upon the work
- Distribute copies of the work
- Perform the work publicly
- Display the work publicly
- Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to self-archive the article,
- The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal (Veteran Law Review).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. VELREV will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author's internal dispute. VELREV will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) are aware that VELREV entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
VELREV will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. JOSI's editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.
.
